• Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Frankly, saying that it’s unbelievable is no longer workable, it’s been going on for far too long overall, and in this case for there to have been close to a dozen incidents without some recognition of the situation is unacceptable. It’s going to continue until someone is killed, then a working group will be formed to draft a list of recommendations, which will ultimately be ignored. How are they not ashamed to be so shit at their own job, apparently unable to reconcile the very obvious scenario playing out in realtime; this could have been resolved in 10 minutes without deployment of SWAT, if he’s broadcasting his gameplay live, worldwide over the web, the cops could literally pull up his stream and call him. This isn’t some random unknown person, with a 911 call coming in about noise/domestic abuse/firearm discharge/someone screaming for help because they’re getting murdered, they could literally see for themselves via an adult version of a nanny cam…

        “We’re fucking halfwits, unable to resolve this situation by the normal, common sense means which anyone but Police would use. Embarrassing us with news coverage of our incompetence won’t work either, you’ll have to take us to court, win, obtain a settlement which will be paid by taxpayers instead of us, and we’ll do it again anyways. Just try to stop us, we dare you, suing us just makes us mad because we’re abusive, stupid little babies who can kick in your door, raid you with submachineguns and get away with it.” -cops

    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which would be pretty dumb if something actually happened there.

      If someone prank calls the police around here they get a (pretty hefty) fine. Other than that, not much will happen. Police will still show up, they will (usually) still take you seriously, they have to.

      • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Let’s be real, it’s dumb even before someone gets killed. This is the human equivalent to a dog barking at birds/squirrels/rabbits/other dogs/the mailman that it can see through the front window of its house for the entirety of its life without reconciling that there’s no need to kick up a fuss - how in the fuck have they not yet acknowledged that there is no actual reason to deploy SWAT teams? Who the fuck are these people? There’s no threat to anyone, they know it, but continue calling it in and sending cops after it’s happened this many times?

        • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dude. They have to treat it as a serious call. ITS THEIR FUCKING JOB.

          They can’t just go “here’s a call about an active shooter. It’s probably just a prank call”

          And if they did. YOU WOULD BE RIGHT THERE IN THE COMMENTS FUCKING COMPLAINING THAT THEY DON’T TREAT ALL CALLS AS SERIOUS.

          they know it,

          Not until they send someone fucking over there they don’t. Unless they started hiring fucking Mystic Meg.

      • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        With prior reports, they should be aware he gets harrassed instead of endangered. The 4th time, the caller should have been swatted.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    You would think if its happened that many times the police would at least have some kind of flag on the address that its happened before.