I am watching a BBC doc about the Nuremberg trials. It is overall propagandizing against the concept of trying crimes against humanity at all. Due to, as described, the british position: it’ll just be another chance for the defendants to present their position to the world so better to hang them and be done with it.
Q: Agree/disagree with the above? Both in the specific instance, and in general.
It was the first, but not the last, such proceeding. What are we learning from subsequent?
Oh sorry - it wasn’t supposed to. More tongue in cheek to the point that someone could be forced to give up “their” land as punishment; or re-educated to the point where they do it willingly (either in good faith reparations or in abandonment of the concept of “private property”). And so the end standard would effectively be that they embrace anarcho-communism
deleted by creator