Luniio@lemmy.worldBanned to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoLondon knife crime vs viral content about London crimelemmy.worldimagemessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1821arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1809arrow-down1imageLondon knife crime vs viral content about London crimelemmy.worldLuniio@lemmy.worldBanned to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square91linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70·2 months agoBecause I don’t understand correlation vs causation, I can only conclude that the monetization of X caused a steep decline in knife violence
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up22·2 months agoProbably because all the criminals are too busy posting about scary Muslim knife attacks on X.
minus-squaredraco_aeneus@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoThese two graphs cover different time periods. It looks like the monetization of X lines up with that hump of sharply increased knife crime at the end there.
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI think that it’s true specifically because you don’t understand correlation vs causation /s
Because I don’t understand correlation vs causation, I can only conclude that the monetization of X caused a steep decline in knife violence
Probably because all the criminals are too busy posting about scary Muslim knife attacks on X.
deleted by creator
These two graphs cover different time periods. It looks like the monetization of X lines up with that hump of sharply increased knife crime at the end there.
I think that it’s true specifically because you don’t understand correlation vs causation
/s