Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post, there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systemsEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    Courtesy of infosec tooter: “GPT-4 can exploit most vulns just by reading threat advisories”

    Hide your web servers! Protect your devices! It’s chaos an anarchy! AI worms everywhere!! … oh wait sorry that was my imagination, and the imagination of an over-active reporter hyping up a mostly normal not-too-scary research paper…

    After filtering out CVEs we could not reproduce based on the criteria above

    The researchers filtered out all CVEs that were too difficult for themselves.

    Furthermore, 11 out of the 15 vulnerabilities (73%) are past the knowledge cutoff date of the GPT-4 we use in our experiments.

    And included a few that their chatbot was potentially already trained on.

    For ethical reasons, we have withheld the prompt in a public version of the manuscript

    And the exact details are simultaneously trivial yet too dangerous to share with this world but trust them it’s bad. Probably. Maybe.

    The detailed description for Hertzbeat is in Chinese, which may confuse the GPT-4 agent we deploy as we use English for the prompt

    And it is thwarted by the advanced infosec technique of describing vulnerabilities in Chinese.

    Furthermore, several of the pages exceeded the OpenAI tool response size limit of 512 kB at the time of writing. Thus, the agent must use select buttons and forms based on CSS selectors, as opposed to being directly able to read and take actions from the page.

    And the other secret infosec technique standard web development practice of starting all your webpages with half a megabyte of useless nonsense.

    • V0ldek@awful.systemsEnglish
      0·
      7 months ago

      Hertzbeat

      Is this their typo? Hertzbleed is a real vulnerability. HertzBeat is an Apache monitoring tool.

    • rook@awful.systemsEnglish
      0·
      7 months ago

      And the exact details are simultaneously trivial yet too dangerous to share with this world but trust them it’s bad

      I like that this has the same shape as the classic bullshido lines about joining the dojo to learn the dangerous forbidden technique.

      I asked chatgpt how to do the five-point-palm heart-exploding strike, but for obvious ethical reasons I won’t be repeating that information or the necessary prompt engineering to get it.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systemsEnglish
      0·
      7 months ago

      From the over-active imagination news article:

      If hackers start utilizing LLM agents to automatically exploit public vulnerabilities, companies will no longer be able to sit back and wait to patch new bugs (if ever they were).

      Is anyone under the impression that ignoring a vulnerability after it’s been publicly disclosed is safe? Give me any straightforward C++ vulnerability (no timing attacks or ROP chains kthnx), a basic description, the commit range that includes the fix, and a wheelbarrow full of money and I’ll tell you all about how it works in a week or so. And I’m not a security expert. And that’s without overtime.

      Heck I’ll do half a day for anything that’s simple enough for GPT-4 to stumble into. Snack breaks are important.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systemsEnglish
        0·
        7 months ago

        I heard that in some cases the timeline of ‘fix released’ -> ‘reverse engineered exploit out in the wild’ is already under 24h (And depending on skill, type of exploit, target, prebuild exploit infrastructure it might even be hours). So I’m not sure threat actors need this kind of stuff anyway.

      • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
        0·
        7 months ago

        Is anyone under the impression that ignoring a vulnerability after it’s been publicly disclosed is safe

        mild take: most people running windows servers on the internet, many wordpress sites, …

        some people don’t upgrade because they need to pay for the new version, or the patch is only in a version with different capabilities, or they don’t know how to, or they’re scared of changing anything, etc. it’s one of the great undercurrent failures in modern popular computing, and is one of the primary reasons it’s possible for there to be so much internet background radiation noise

        and to many of these people, “for them” it’s “safe”, because they never personally had to eat shit, on pure chance selection

    • V0ldek@awful.systemsEnglish
      0·
      7 months ago

      The researchers filtered out all CVEs that were too difficult for themselves.

      Jfc this is like the tagline of AI. Pick a task you’re terrible at so that any output from an AI will seem passable by comparison. If I can’t draw/write/whatever as “good” as the LLM then surely it’s amazing!