Police in the town of Savage, Minnesota, are now investigating an attack on a little girl at a local school by assailants, schoolchildren, who told officials they beat her up because "she wasn't Muslim."
Why are you stuck on the prevalence of white supremacist violence reportings? We’ve already established it’s irrelevant. For the comparison between Muslims and white supremacists made to have been correct at all, you would have to be able to name a single white supremacist who isn’t a racist.
Your refusal to directly address this flaw in the comparison tells me you have no justification for the comparison itself, which is why you can’t stop bringing up prevalence.
I’ll be here just as soon as you decide to directly respond. But I guess you just want to keep repeating this circle.
Maybe if I repeat it once more, you’ll get it? STG it’s like arguing with a skipping record.
You’ve yet to explain why it’s necessary that a white supremacists good guy exists for my point to be valid. You’ve just keep saying over and over that I must provide one. I’ll be here as soon as you decide to provide that reasoning, but I guess you’ll want to keep repeating this circle.
I’ve explained this as-nauseam, including in the message you’re replying to. If you still don’t know why that’s not my fault. Sorry you’re having trouble with this.
I have been explaining in every comment in this thread, you’ve just been either choosing not to directly address it or you still don’t understand that my argument has been ignoring prevalence in favor of the logic of the comparison itself.
I’ll keep going in this circle for as long as you want though.
Here’s your evidence that white supremacists violence is rare. Is that valid enough for you?
https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/images/2023-02/Murder and Extremism in the United States in 2022-table1.jpg
Why are you stuck on the prevalence of white supremacist violence reportings? We’ve already established it’s irrelevant. For the comparison between Muslims and white supremacists made to have been correct at all, you would have to be able to name a single white supremacist who isn’t a racist.
Your refusal to directly address this flaw in the comparison tells me you have no justification for the comparison itself, which is why you can’t stop bringing up prevalence.
I’ll be here just as soon as you decide to directly respond. But I guess you just want to keep repeating this circle.
Maybe if I repeat it once more, you’ll get it? STG it’s like arguing with a skipping record.
You’ve yet to explain why it’s necessary that a white supremacists good guy exists for my point to be valid. You’ve just keep saying over and over that I must provide one. I’ll be here as soon as you decide to provide that reasoning, but I guess you’ll want to keep repeating this circle.
I’ve explained this as-nauseam, including in the message you’re replying to. If you still don’t know why that’s not my fault. Sorry you’re having trouble with this.
Also, nice projection.
You haven’t explained your reasoning why in any reply to me. I wonder why…
I have been explaining in every comment in this thread, you’ve just been either choosing not to directly address it or you still don’t understand that my argument has been ignoring prevalence in favor of the logic of the comparison itself.
I’ll keep going in this circle for as long as you want though.
You claim to have a reason why but you won’t provide it. I wonder why that is.
Now you’re repeating yourself….
I am repeating myself because you won’t provide a reason why. If you did we could move forward.