Kaboom@reddthat.com to Conservative@lemm.ee · 6 months agoNew filings reveal FBI authorized use of DEADLY FORCE when they raided Mar-a-Lagonotthebee.comexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down147
arrow-up1-33arrow-down1external-linkNew filings reveal FBI authorized use of DEADLY FORCE when they raided Mar-a-Lagonotthebee.comKaboom@reddthat.com to Conservative@lemm.ee · 6 months agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squarejetAlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·6 months agoWhen are armed police officers not allowed to use deadly force when necessary?
minus-squareKaboom@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down12·6 months agoPretty much all the time. It might be a slap on the wrist or something when they kill someone, but giving the ahead to kill people isnt common.
minus-squarejetAlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoThe key word is when necessary. Police are always, always, just like any citizen, authorized to use deadly force… When necessary. When it becomes necessary, it falls into the realm of self-defense.
When are armed police officers not allowed to use deadly force when necessary?
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Pretty much all the time. It might be a slap on the wrist or something when they kill someone, but giving the ahead to kill people isnt common.
The key word is when necessary.
Police are always, always, just like any citizen, authorized to use deadly force… When necessary.
When it becomes necessary, it falls into the realm of self-defense.