WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump “is fine”
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Do not advocate or celebrate violence, please. Comments advocating violence will be deleted and bans will be issued.

    Also, please avoid promoting conspiracies. Discussing current events is fine but suggesting things like “it’s a false flag” without evidence is spreading a conspiracy.

      • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not a justification for more violence, two wrongs don’t make a right. He was wrong for doing what he did and this is wrong as well. This is because political violence in it’s entirety is wrong. Jesus, do people not have principles anymore? Seeing all the supposedly moral people turn into Q anon level conspiracy theorists who condone violence is depressing.

              • SLfgb@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The US invaded Iraq under GW Bush on a lie about WMD’s. Killed Saddam and countless Iraqis, including journalists, for nothing.

                The US invaded Afghanistan rather than negotiate with its ruling power to hand over Bin Laden, then didn’t get their hands on him for another decade even though the US won the war and took over the country from day 1. 20+ years of bloody occupation later you lost the war and the Taliban is back in power. Another pointess war started with deception.

                Don’t get me started on Vietnam.

                You guys have some twisted idea of democracy where the ‘Democrats’ don’t even elect their own candidates.

                Please stop exporting democracy. The world doesn’t want your perverse version.

                Hitler killed himself btw.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Tell me, should we have turned the other cheek during WWII? Two wrongs don’t make a right after all, right?

          • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            We didn’t join WWII because the Nazis were bad, we joined because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and then Hitler declared war on the US.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Really? You don’t realize that the US didn’t join a war that started in 1939 until 1941 when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor … so was only part of the war for less than 4 years?

                Wow!

                • retrospectology@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You inferred something about Nazis, and now what you’re saying makes no sense as a response to what I’ve been asking you.

                  I’ll put it more clearly so you can actually give an answer: When Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, you’re saying we should’ve turned the other cheek?

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        How many deaths did it result in? Cause there is only one death on Jan 6 that has ever been attributed to Jan 6.

        I don’t disagree that he incited the insurrection, but making false claims doesn’t help show that the left is the party of honesty.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why are you pretending like right-wing violence isn’t the literal leading domestic security threat?

          Have you been living under a rock since 2016?

            • retrospectology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Well, yeah, I mean, we can go back a hundred years, conservatives will always be pushing violence and division whatever era you look at since they can’t hold power without it, I mostly mean it’s come out fully into the open since 2016. The mask dropped off completely and they’re no longer even pretending to be anything but the Confederacy 2.0.

      • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If the only way you can discuss an assassination is by advocating for additional violence and pushing lies, then I guess not?

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not really what I said at all. “Hey guys, don’t make stuff up, please rely on credible sources, and don’t advocate for violence”.

            Or, in other words: follow the rules we’ve always had in place

            • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Advocating for, or not advocating for, violence is a political stance. Many people defend Israel’s ongoing genocide and are not blocked from doing so. That doesn’t feel like the rules being consistently enforced. The people speculating on whether or not this is staged have access to the same information as everyone else, and in the spirit of true discourse, if it was seen to be false you could figure that out by discussion rather than censorship.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think your advocating for or celebrating violence, but this comment is probably going to be taken that way and deleted. I totally agree with your point though, a failed assassination attempt is probably the worst thing you can do to a guy who wants to destroy democracy.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        All things being equal, I am glad that the assassin failed. I am no fan of Trump by any measure. I wish, every day, that Trump would just go away and stay out of politics.

        I feel that assassinating someone like Trump would only intensify the right-wing’s rhetoric and make things worse in the long run. I also feel that whomever would replace Trump would be far much worse than Trump himself. It’s a lose-lose either way.

        No, the appropriate thing to do is to vote these bastards out of office. I fear the worst, that maybe we’re going to fail doing that; we’re what, 4 months away from the election and we’re talking about replacing Biden, but NOBODY has said with whom? Yeah that’s confidence inspiring.

        My doomer mentality aside, I do still hope I’m wrong, and that democracy and justice will prevail. But dammit if the “good guys” aren’t bending over backwards to make that hard to believe.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          we’re talking about replacing Biden, but NOBODY has said with whom?

          People have said over, and over, and over that it would be Harris. She is beating both Trump and Biden in the polls, is able to take over the Biden-Harris campaign funds with minimal legal dispute, she appeals more to women, independents, black voters etc.

          It’s not a question. She’s not ideal, but she actually stands a chance to beat Trump. Biden does not, especially now. It would be Harris. Now you know.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have heard that mentionedonce or twice, but never concretely. Most of what I’ve been seeing is that “Biden should step down,” and nothing more.

            Either way, the last thing the Democratic Party needs right now is more fragmentation. If they’re going to replace Biden, just fucking do it already. If not, shut the fuck up about it. Time is ticking, and it’s not on our side.

            4 months is not a long time to campaign. We’re already halfway through July. This should’ve been figured out long ago.

            • retrospectology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I have heard that mentionedonce or twice, but never concretely. Most of what I’ve been seeing is that “Biden should step down,” and nothing more.

              Because that’s the order of operations. But if you having only heard it twice is because you’re not paying attention, not because people haven’t been talking about it.

              Biden has already fragmented the party, he simply cannot win. It’s not viable. No one can force him to leave. And no, people should not “shut the fuck up about it” since doing so means Democrats will lose for sure. Democrats will unify more behind any candidate who is not as polarizing and alienating as Biden. If he stays in past the convention then you can start telling people to shut the fuck up, but until the convention is over people should be doing everything they can to convince him to leave.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Must the Democrats champion good manners ALL the time? Jesus Christ he’s a fascist! Fuck good sportsmanship!

      Who the fuck are you trying to impress? Who’s going to consider this the moment they vote for Biden over Trump?

      “Violence has no place in America.”

      Cops killing citizens. Native genocide. Genocide in Palestine. Protesters being beaten. People using their “rights” being arrested and killed. Slow socially accepted murder caused by poverty. Rights for Queer youth being taken away, which leads to self harm.

      Why do they just give “thoughts and prayers” to Hitler 2.0? Trump isn’t going to be kind with this, he’ll start saying every Democrat is responsible for this. Fuck the “higher moral ground”.

    • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I doubt it. Something like this already happened before in 2017. A deranged Bernie supporter went to a congressional baseball game and tried to shoot as many Republicans as he could. He ended up killing 6 people. However, despite that, there were no reactionary shootings. It was an isolated incident. I think this will be the same, or at least I hope.

        • SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          We literally have no idea what Stephen Paddock’s motivation was. The Las Vegas shooting was not a reaction to the congressional shooting

          • retrospectology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Read your first sentence, then read your second sentence. Then do it again a few more times, and then ask yourself why I would listen to anything you say?

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I mean, the right is already committing violence against its enemies, the media just fails to report it as what it is. Instead it’s “lone wolves” and “mental health problems”. Rittenhouse literally shot people on camera and got away with it “because skateboard”.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didn’t need this fucking stress on top of everything else. I only hope that the poll bump he’ll get for this is short-lived.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      He is going to win. We’ve already been over this. Maybe now you can start the process of coming to terms with what that actually means.

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re being down voted but you’re right. This is the absolute nail in the coffin to seal his win. his culties are going to be mobilised more than ever now.