• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “This incident shows clearly that Windows must prioritize change and innovation in the area of end-to-end resilience,”

    Business-speak for “Maybe it’s time we started making it not break so easily.”

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      More like they want to use this to justify locking the kernel from end user change completely, thus enabling them to truly lock down any system.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t disagree, but it’s MY machine. I can choose to not use the apps that want kernel access, which is about the only thing we can do.

          The reason anti-cheats use kernel is because end users keep playing the games. I don’t have a good answer here, because too many people just can’t be bothered to understand their tacit agreement to this garbage

          • Veticia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            At this point I’m scared to install a game without doing a research of what kind of intrusive software it uses. Sometimes it’s just safer to install it on a console.