Dutch beach volleyball player Steven van de Velde, who served time in prison after he was convicted of raping a 12-year-old girl, won his second match at the Paris Olympics and received an even harsher reaction from the crowd on Wednesday than for his first match.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    So there also shouldn’t be laws? Because otherwise I’m not sure how matters of law should be settled like this if people aren’t familiar with the laws.

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, society needs rules, but they don’t need to be all that complex, and the real nuances or loopholes are better handled as individual cases

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you underestimate how many laws you need to keep a nation functional.

        Even Hammurabi had 282 written laws and his was a ‘whatever the king says is illegal is illegal’ empire.

        You need laws to cover everything from murder to product safety to child custody after divorce. And none of those are able to solved simply every time because many cases have a lot of nuance.

        On top of that, as I said, you need a lot of rules covering courtroom procedures. Expecting a random citizen to understand things like when something can be presented as evidence and what sort of questions a witness can be asked is expecting too much of them.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You make a great point - you do need a lot of laws… if the intent is to oppress people. Less so if you want a fair and equitable society.

          You’re not really engaging with what I’m saying because you’re so assured and confident in your world view.

          We don’t have to live in a hierarchical society where we are owned by our rulers. We can create a different world with our own rules.

          I don’t know what those rules should be - no single person possibly ever could. My position is that the world we have is fundamentally, structurally, and intentionally unequal, unjust, and impossible to reform. We need to depose those who have created and enforced the current system and replace them with a new, fairer system designed from the ground up by all of us, not a new replacement elite.

          It is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism, but if we don’t end capitalism, we will instead live to see the end of the modern human civilisation.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            A system of laws has nothing to do with capitalism. Pre-capitalist nations had laws, so did (and do) communist nations. Laws simply keep everything operating smoothly. And if you have an entity the size of a nation, you’ll need a lot of laws to cover the many issues regarding the many people in that nation. That has nothing to do with the economic system or the form of government.

            • sandbox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              There are no communist nations currently existing and there never have been any. I didn’t say that laws would not exist. I’m saying that the laws we currently have enforce and uphold capitalism, just as the laws of prior eras upheld feudalism, or monarchism, or whatever.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Okay, well then if laws exist, in your scenario, everyone would have to be equally familiar with them.

                • sandbox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Sure. You can’t participate in a sport or a game without knowing the rules. So too is it unfair to expect people to participate in society without knowing its laws.

                  In our society, laws exist to be a cudgel wielded against the working class, but are not applicable against the ruling class except for internal power struggles. You already know in your heart that the people responsible for the climate disaster that we’re currently facing will never face justice unless we take it into our own hands.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    First of all, that also has nothing to do with people needing to know the entirety of a system of laws if they are expected to be randomly selected to adjudicate.

                    Secondly, when are you going to take it into your own hands?