• Skasi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why does it make you suspicious? Oh I see, blades near genitals sure are scary.

      On the statistic: A little bit of a snip doesn’t seem very expensive to me. I wonder if this statistic also includes the cost for consulting with the doctor or the reduced risk of spreading HIV to other people. According to some reports on the topic by the World Health Organization and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it seems to reduce the risk of HIV infection by a bit more than 50% and reduces other infection risks too.

      Assuming $1000 can afford about 20 to 50 circumcisions, assuming they happen almost exclusively for high risk males (eg men with wife working as a sex worker, or wife living in high risk areas in south/east africa, or men frequently changing sex partners) and assuming this extends life spans for about 5 to 20 years by preventing an infection, those numbers kinda seem sane.

      edits: Added links, better formatting, some extra comments, etc.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        $1000 for 50 circumcisions? I bet I could get into that market by

        (•_•)

        ( •_•)>⌐■-■

        (⌐■_■)

        Undercutting.

        • Skasi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          😄 Wordplay!
          A quick note since it might not be clear, I just randomly assumed that doctors need about 1 or 2 hours to consult with the patient and do the operation. With an average hourly wage in South Africa according to “the internet” of about $15 to $20 and medical tools/facilities costing an estimated $10 or so. Maybe it’s a bit more or less, but those numbers seemed sane and careful enough. Like all the numbers in my estimation they could easily be off by a factor of two or so. Also, since this is about disease prevention note that this is hopefully not done by some random black market quack doctor.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Is that why circumcision is a thing?

        Cut off your son’s dickskin so he doesn’t die early from whatever he gets up to when he grows up to become a man-slut?

        • Skasi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You mean besides the religious ritual aspect and telling people what to do? From a medical perspective that seems to be the whole idea yeah.

          • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            These two things are not mutually exclusive. People back in the day were just as smart as us, it’s likely they noticed people who had their dick snipped were more likely to not-die, and so it became a religious mandate. A lot of religious dogma has a basis in functional routines or hygiene. Think of how Islam asks you to wash yourself before praying. Yes it is because you’re presenting yourself to God, but also because people realized washing yourself often seemed to have a positive effect on your health, maybe you got sick less often, which sounds like a blessing, doesn’t it?

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you cut your legs, it will prevent leg diseases too, how does the study consider this bias?

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If you cut something out, then you can’t have diseases on this part anymore, but it doesn’t mean it’s a health benefit overall. I used the leg example to make the idea more obvious.

    • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it is a left over thing from the aids epidemic… There are slightly higher rates of transmission if you are circumcised. I suspect that the information in this graph is either wrong or outdated.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Man, I don’t know about you, but my foreskin has at least killed 2 people, that I know’ve.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know how many people my foreskin has killed, because it was stolen from me before I could speak. So I have to assume it grew up on the streets, fell in with a bad crowd, and turned to drug dealing to get by.

        Stop drug dealers by keeping foreskins where they belong: on penii.

  • gazter@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there a sub that is less focused on interesting data, and more focused on data presented beautifully?