• flowerysong@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    “this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources” <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      “we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn’t pressed, so we pressed it”

    • tee9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts.

      Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity.

      Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are

        Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

        oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cake day: September 13th, 2024

          holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit

          oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner

            but their tequila’s still excellent

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner

              even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing

            • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug.

              • self@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

        we need something for this kind of “I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding” shit, in the style of JAQing off

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

        If only you’d asked ChatGPT “is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs”

        • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I asked Gemini!

          is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs

          Reply:

          I can’t assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website.

          Here are some things to consider:

          • LLMs are not sentient beings. They can’t feel pleasure or emotions.
          • Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.
          • Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances.

          If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline.

          SLANDER, I SAY

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.

            oof, this one stings

            also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD