Multiple times, from multiple ISPs, when signing up for the internet, they insist on giving me cable TV. They make the price for cable TV bundled internet much lower than internet by itself. I think they’re trying to juice their subscriber numbers even if you never ever ever use the TV service
No one wants to pay for channels they don’t watch…
even when the cable company put out a really light weight, pick your own channels (10) package at a lower price… two hours on the phone getting it sorted out, my bill went down a whole five bucks a month. i never watched the channels i no longer got, so five bucks saved was five bucks.
the savings was completely negated (and then some) two months later by a rate hike in the ‘below the line’ bullshit fees and surcharges–which by themselves is now about double the final monthly cost of ‘basic cable’ 25 years ago (back then, the plain ‘basic cable’ did include a few actual and popular cable channels, too. those were pulled off that about 15 years ago).
i am no longer a cable tv subscriber. i no longer watch local tv channels, either. as they can’t be received by antenna where i live.
I watch nothing but Blue Bloods 24/7 and will pay any price for whatever number of channels gets me Blue Bloods
Is there not a blue bloods channel on plutotv or something?
Years ago, in Australia, I wanted to watch Formula 1. It was only available on Foxtel. I had to pay $25/m to get Foxtel—all shit I didn’t want. Then $25 to get the sports package—mostoy all shit I also didn’t care about or watch. Then $25 to get HD (1080).
$75 to watch F1, no other options but finding pirate streams. After a couple rounds, of course I cancelled and just pirated once friends found reliable sources.
I have elderly friends who still pay $200 a month for 500 channels … and they only watch the same 2 channels every day.
I cut my cord about 15 years ago and just watch streaming TV or hundreds of downloaded movies and TV shows.
Why pay money for cable for shows you have to schedule your time around or prerecord content when you can just pay for one or two streaming services and watch stuff when you want.
I switched to YouTube TV years ago, but now it costs as much as cable (still somewhat better functionality for me though). If I could do a few sports streaming subscriptions I could drop that also. Use an antenna for local TV news when needed, but most of them do free streaming of their news and weather emergencies.
sports streaming subscriptions
Use an antenna
I’m not a sports fan, but this is like the 3rd time in the last week I’ve seen someone say they only have something for sports but also have OTA tv.
…can you not watch sports OTA anymore or something?
Like, back in the 1900s when I was a kid, everything was broadcast and you could pretty much always just turn on the tv at the appropriate time on the appropriate network and get your baseball/basketball/hockey/soccer/football/etc game.
Its getting super fragmented and a lot of sports are not on OTA tv. NFL is pretty good but some games are on paytv but will be simulcast on a local channel if your local team is playing. My local MLB team used to be on paytv only and now that Bally thankfully went belly up, they don’t have a broadcast deal. I don’t watch baseketball but NBA and most college is on cable. My local college football team was on FS1 today.
If you just want to watch Sports™ and don’t particularly care what sport that is you’ll probably find at least one or two channels on the weekends that will be showing something. Most sports fans have particular teams they follow, though, and outside of the NFL most of those teams’ games will end up on cable. Even the NFL has the Monday Night Football game on ESPN (usually) and Thursday Night Football isn’t even on TV; it’s on Amazon Prime streaming. Broadcast channels have decided they don’t want to deal with the unpredictability of sports on weeknights to a large extent.
League championships are about the only thing we’ll see on most weeknights anymore, and I expect even those will move to cable at least sometimes. It is somewhat surprising since networks are starting to find live sports to be the biggest viewership draw nowadays; most fans want to see the results live. Other shows are easier to stream/binge later. But sports broadcast rights have also been getting more and more expensive and the networks are reluctant to pay for them.
You might be thinking of in the 20th century a local team’s games might show on a local broadcast channel. Usually this was an independent (no network affiliation) channel or they’d just preempt the network programming. The networks don’t like having their shows preempted (I know one station that switched from CBS to NBC a few years ago because CBS didn’t want them to keep preempting network programming for college sports) and regional cable channels came in offering more money for exclusive rights to all games except the nationally televised games. So a lot of games that used to be on broadcast moved to cable (cable also allowed some teams that used to only have some games broadcast to now broadcast their entire schedule). This hasn’t been entirely immune to the wider cable “cord cutting” phenomenon, though, and more sports are moving towards offering a streaming option on the Internet, although it’s usually not a complete option yet.
I stopped watching cable when the History Channel stopped playing history.
