• uranibaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish I could use Linux at work but the software used does not have any alternative (that I can use) and I can’t be bothered with debloating and all that jazz. I try to keep work and private seperate instead.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      My work has a process for requesting software. Over the last five years, I’ve been slowly getting open source alterntives approved, using them, and telling coworkers they’re approved. It’s just one super specialized software left.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nice!

        I work at a very small company, so there is no policy for which software to use and I would replace the one software that is Windows only if I could, even if I had to remain on Windows. The problem I have in this case is that we rely external tools that only work with this software, only on Windows. :-(

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Teams.

      I fucking hate teams.

      Why are we using teams.

      Why did they change outlook, it used to actually be good.

      • Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        There used to be a linux repo for installing teams but they recently removed it. Now you’re forced to use the shitty excuse of a PWA.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Either way I’m stuck on W11 at work. No way am I installing teams on my machine at home.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The browser-based versions of the M365 apps work great* for me in Firefox tabs on Linux. I prefer them being just apps/sites that I use as needed and not deeply integrated with the OS just because the same company made the two.

          • I mean they work as intended for the same stuff I’ve used the Windows versions for, not that they are great apps on their own, lol
          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Teams doesn’t work well for me on Linux w/Firefox (it doesn’t detect my headset properly) but it works great in Edge.

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Teams can go fuck itself with a rock. We’ve taken licensing now that doesn’t include it.

        Still holding on to classic outlook as long as possible. The new version/skin/glow-up can go share the aforementioned rock with teams. Where’s my VBA, where’s my ribbon customisations, and why must it be dumbed down to Fisher-Price levels of ‘user friendliness’?

        A lot of my answers to user questions these days are ‘Because Microsoft ™️’.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You used to be able to paste any number of emails into a group in outlook. Now you have to add one email at a time.

          Got 100 email addresses to add to a group? Fuck you.

          No “upgrade” has impeded my productivity as much as W11 and the new office.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tried get my dad to use Linux for his work but had problems with his clients not being able to open the files he sent using the Linux word and Excell programs. So that’s clear for him not to use Linux.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because of the requirements like TPM2 and a bunch of of others.

          Most places I know need to replace all their devices to support Windows 11. For the workload they are expected to run that hardware was fine.

            • Ziglin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              Understandable, I don’t really see how it’s related to this thread though.

              • uranibaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Because you talked about my computer not supporting Windows 11?? So I clarified that it does support it and came pre-installed, and I would still prefer pop_OS (i.e. not relevant, as you said).

                I can’t believe your computers support Windows 11.

                I don’t understand why that would have to do with anything to being with, though.

    • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me the funniest part is that telemetry is usually for ads to convince people to buy stuff, and secondly for nation states to track you, but the debloat crowd usually never leaves home (a registered address) or buys anything, and surprisingly apt at credit card points with the money they do spend (the og trackers).

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get your point. I would asume that those who chose to remove adware and remove telemetry would also be the same group that use ad blockers.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If it takes you hours to debloat Windows, you better stick with an OS you do know.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Every time I see a Linux user’s criticism of a problem with Windows, it’s the kind of thing your grandma asks you to fix for her and takes ten seconds 😂

      Calling Windows unstable in this day and age is fucking laughable too. If your installation is unstable, it’s either you or your hardware

      • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeach windows has problems but stability is definietly not one of them. Likewise linux has problems but in fact it is not harder to use ( in fact it is so easy to use that it is reasonably popular to put some easy distro in some forsaken by time laptop instead of windows for pepole who use browser and literaly nothing else ). Frankly speaking most pepole just dont give enough f about their system. The best i can say about it is that pop os specificaly just looks better ( i am in the apparent minority of pepole that very much likes the looks of gnome ). The best way to populrize linux is to have it by deafult instead of windows on laptops and prebuilds but that will never really happen ( they make insane amount of money on Markup by having windows installed despite the fact that they get it for really really cheap. Its really apparent when you compare some laptops that can be bought without the os preinstalled )

        • Grian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          It isnt that hard, moved from wondows 10 to mint, and a few months later to arch, and it took me less than 2 hours to install arch, and thats with slow internet.

          And i learned a lot whole doing it, like Dekstop environments, disk partitoning(root, swap, and boot), filesystems, and a lot more.

          I wouldnt recommend it to everyone, but it is great if you want to learn more about computers.

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The wiki is actually good for beginners, too. As you are often forced to reallylly read through subpages and cross-referenced topics until you somewhat understand why you are doing something instead of just how. Doesn’t make it easy ofc but a beginner can totally handle the wiki, it just takes more time.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, this has more or less sold me on giving arch a shot in the near future. I really need to get some fundamental Linux knowledge under my belt, and the arch wiki is legendary for being pretty comprehensive.

            • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I may get stabbed for this but, go for Endeavour, unless a (probably needlessly) tedious install process is important to you.

              I had vanilla Arch up and running for a bit but kept having issues with Steam, so switched to Endeavour and haven’t had any issues since. Its still a pretty basic version of Arch, with a few minor QoL improvements like having yay and a DE already installed.

  • Juice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Beginner friendly??? Not sure how to explain this to Linux users that post on Lemmy but we’re not the regular pc user and have a very different view on beginner friendly lol

    • cook_pass_babtridge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I tried explaining to some of my non-technical friends what a “Linux distribution” is. Most don’t quite understand what I mean by “operating system”. I think we’re in a bit of a bubble here.

      • Juice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Heck yeah. I usually have to explain what an OS is in the first place too. I usually use android versus iOS as an example. I feel kinda fortunate sometimes that my wife’s hobbies don’t line up with my own most of the time because it does keep my brain in check from falling into those bubbles. She appreciates having free tech support on hand of course lol

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You need to KISS your explanation. Don’t talk about OS’s or even distros. Avoid the technical stuff, save that for later as they ask about it. Instead just tell them it looks different, but in the end works the same. And it does it without the hassle, bloat or cost of Microsoft.

    • Shadow Glider@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recently swapped to Linux Mint and it really was not harder than Windows, and I know functionally nothing on how anything Linux related actually works.

      • Juice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh I’m not saying that it’s hard for us here. Most people don’t know that Mac and Windows are different if they aren’t in a tech position let alone know that Linux exists at all. I’m talking about the general person on the street, it’s hard to remember that we don’t always fit into that group.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        And there is little to nothing to fear. The big bad terminal and command line isn’t needed for day to day use anymore. It’s been years since the last time I needed to compile anything. And if I ever do need to do that again, something is definitely wrong.

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            For daily use, you don’t need the command line. Only in fairly rare instances do you need to resort to it when things go wrong. And those commands are a mere google away. So don’t let the that big bad scary terminal stand in your way. It’s not the stumbling block you think it is.

            • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh, I live in the terminal, even on Windows. I like having that capability. Not everybody does though.

              • bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Then it’s a habit not a fear. I also am comfortable with the cli since I started with Linux back at RedHat 5 and Mandrake 6. It was learn it or die in those days. But as time has passed, I find myself using it less and less because I don’t really need it everyday. But while I might need to google a specific command because I forgot it, I still remember it’s possible and handy.

    • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This entire thread talking about how a distro is better than the next because you “only” have to update keyrings to update so even basic users should get it.

  • curiousPJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ehhh…as a Linux beginner on Ubuntu I disagree… I spent a couple hours trying to get an AppImage application as a desktop icon.

    Spent an additional hour or two to mount NAS drives. Fstab?? Wtf.

    My secondary monitor flickers to black randomly for a just couple minutes after startup and there’s no way I’m going to dig through Wayland to figure out why. Monitor orientation is incorrect on startup and I again don’t want to dig through Wayland or whatever cfg file I need to open…yet.

    Still needed to browse at least 5 different sources for answers.

    I’m glad Firefox doesn’t crash at 500 tabs or w/e but Linux still has issues with some primitive tasks that windows has well figured out.

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny because as somebody that’s been using Linux full-time for over 10 years I actually really really really really hate that Ubuntu is considered beginner friendly because I often find very very simple tasks incredibly frustrating on it.

      I know that everybody disagrees with me but I genuinely think that something based on arch like Endeavor OS is genuinely more beginner friendly. You don’t have to fight with repositories to get up to date drivers, virtually any piece of software you could ever want is either already in the extra/community repo or available through the Aur. And while yes it is possible that an update could end up causing an issue on your system Pac-Man is just way way better about not completely destroying the system and it is pretty easy to roll back. Even in a really really bad worst case scenario booting from a live USB and rolling back with chroot is easy enough I’ve actually walked people through it before.

      Meanwhile the amount of times on both Debian and Ubuntu that I have had apt completely eviscerate a system just trying to do basic updates and then just bail out Midway leaving the system so broken that the terminal barely functions anymore is frustrating. And there’s no particularly easy path to fixing that because dpkg is a fucking nightmare. Yes in the majority of those cases the system was multiple years out of date but that’s no excuse I have updated art systems that were upwards of almost 10 years out of date and other than me having to manually update the key ring and reinitialize the signatures it was able to Simply jump right to the latest just fine.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      True, even user-friendly Linux distros have their pain points. The real difference between Linux and corporate OS products is that you don’t periodically need a new version because of a product churn schedule.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you have to use Wayland? If something’s buggy in Wayland, I always switch back to x11. Wayland’s finally gotten to a point where I can use it without bugs, but that’s taken many years.

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This won’t be popular but I haven’t had a stability problem on my home Windows 11 pro (server) machine. I disabled online login during first boot setup so maybe that’s why … my network handles telemetry shenanigans so I’m not worried about that. Never bothered to put a Linux on it, which was the plan, since it’s not failed once, it’s been a few years since it was spooled up. 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is where I am too. Just built a new gaming pc and was planning to do dual boot.

      Installed windows 11 LTSC and honestly, it’s everything I want in a gaming pc so I guess no need to install Linux.

      Having said that, I bought a pc that came with windows; can’t wait to kill it with fire!

    • Peasley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I found it impossible to set up 11 pro without a Microsoft account. Did you put one in for install and disable it after?

      On 10 if you cut network access during install it’d let you set up offline accounts. On 11 it refuses to finish the installation until you connect to the internet somehow. I had to put my linux laptop in AP mode and connect a patch cable to the windows PC because i hadnt loaded the wifi drivers on the USB i had.

      • RaccoonBall@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Shift +f10 to open a command prompt in the installer

        OOBE\bypassnro

        It reboots and restarts the out of box experience, but this time ‘I don’t have internet’ will be available as an option

        Bonus tip, don’t choose a password either, as it will force stupid recovery questions. You can add that after first boot with net user on the command line.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Eero Secure does a pretty decent job by itself but addresses can be blacklisted as well (hi Roku). If I had more money, time, and could figure out my double NAT, I’d probably switch from Secure to a Firewalla device, probably a Purple. Overall the eero’s have been a great, I don’t have to think about it, mesh system. Of course you have to be okay with Amazon owning them.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Look man. I use my computer primarily for gaming, with a little web browsing. The second Linux can support all games without me having to wrangle and worry about compatibility, plus whatever else config shit I have to go through that I’m sure I’m unaware of, I’ll jump ship headfirst. I’m fucking sick of Microsoft’s bullshit.

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Linux supports most games nowadays. It will never support “all” games. Just like windows doesn’t support all games. At this point in time, saying Linux is not good enough with gaming is weird…

      • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        At this point games that doesn’t support Linux are games that use anti-cheat

        • GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Right, BattleEye is hit or miss depending on the game developer.

          Another significant drawback I have is OBS compatibility. It technically works, but just having it open drops my framerate by ~30%, and having it record drops it by ~50%. I haven’t found a fix for it yet, so I’m effectively unable to stream or record gameplay on Linux. The same settings used in Windows hardly impacts my framerate.

          I’ll continue using Linux, but I haven’t deleted my Windows partition yet.

        • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The part that most don’t talk about is that installing and getting games up and going in Linux that can run in Linux, often takes allot of configuration and trying, but on the plus side it can run many games from older versions of Windows with some configuration.

          It is the configuration that one has to learn how to do which most casual users aren’t skilled enough to do. It is after you learn how to do it that between the Linux Native Games and most other games from Windows.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depending on what games you play it’s anywhere from unusable (games with incompatible anticheat) to flat out better than windows even ignoring all the surrounding bullshit. But many of these gsmes with anticheat are among the most popular games in the world, so there’s plenty of reason not to change just bc of those for a lot of people.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In my experience, Linux supports a handful, maybe even a large handful, but we’re far away from “most.”

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    My experience is the opposite.

    Took an hour just to get a mouse to work on Mint

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Took hours to get wifi working on Mint after wasting a day trying to get my GPU working on Bazzite (all AMD setup before someone asks)

      Meanwhile I install windows with English UK as my language and don’t get any of the bullshit people complain about AND everything works.

      I’ll play Fallen Order on Linux (shader issue on Windows causes stutter while they’re loading while the game is running) and will probably uninstall it and just continue using Windows.

    • Peasley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s wild. Mice are a generic driver just like on Windows. It should be plug and play on either OS.

      Why did it take an hour? Any idea what was happening?

    • freeman@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Still have an absolute mess on Linux Mint with my projector, wrong aspect ratios everywhere, sometimes only one screen is selected. Maybe it has something to do with how and when I connected/booted/powered each device…

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It should be flipped, tho. In my opinion, any “beginner distro” consumes more time in the long run run, compared to the “lightweight” ones (I bet my Arch is way fatter than many beginner distros, lol)

  • hmm@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    i’ve seen someone installed Ubuntu LTS on his gaming pc. he said he has been spending hours to use it, in the end he decided to reinstall windows 11.

  • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a Linux user for a few years now I have to disagree. My friends who still rely on Windows only software for either school or their jobs use Revision OS and installs it with a tool called playbooks which takes only a few minutes and automatically disables feature updates; only allowing security updates to go through. This makes it so all “system updates” are through the playbook app which is pretty cool, it pretty much makes it a Windows fork and won’t revert or break anything when updating

    • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      1, Revision OS is awesome, and good on you for sharing it!
      2, I don’t think that’s you disagreeing really, just offering a “third path”.

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Where did the ‘windows resets all settings after an update’ thing start?

    Somehow I’ve never seen this over using windows 10 for years…

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The privacy stuff? I’ve seen it happen in 11 for sure. I always check after an update now out of habit. But, not seen it in a while.

      Resetting dual boot stuff? Before EFI/UEFI it would happen on most windows updates. It would just overwrite the boot record in a totally arrogant fuck you to whatever was already there. But since EFi/UEFI it plays nice with other operating systems generally.

    • Peasley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      TBF it’s only happened to me once on 8.1 and once on 10. I think it’s an uncommon bug