• djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Nah, key difference is that in atompunk, the energy is typically converted into electricity.

    A big part of steampunk is the pipes moving steam to the contraptions, compared to wires moving electricity.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      That raises the question: are the Voyager probes (or anything with an RTG) considered Atompunk, or do they need random bits of sheet metal welded on to meet the aesthetic first?

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Hmm. Suppose you were building a nuclear locomotive. (Setting aside, for the moment, whether this is a good idea.) Would nuke→turbine→electricity→motor be more efficient than just using the rotation of the turbine to move the train?

      It can’t be, right?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Diesel engine > generator > motor is frequently used for trains nowadays. Transmissions can be super inefficient, especially with discrete gear ratios