Love to see upgrades with a negative net size lmao. Software should get more optimized with time, not more bloated. Oop, just got the gnome console popup notification saying that my install command finished running, sweet – it took as long as making this post

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Exactly. Same here. The fact that „linux“ isnt a product that has to have the shiny new thing after every update and has no deadlines to hold and no manager to keep happy makes it a fundamentally different thing which actually is very much in line with efficiency ideas, the idea of progress and evolution as a whole. At least thats how I view it.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    OS is bloat, if you’re not shifting CPU registers by hand are you even a Linux user?

    spoiler

    No, because Linux is a kernel/OS, and OS is bloat

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Back in the day there was a Mac OS update (Snow Leopard) that took gigabytes off. They dropped support for PowerPC CPUs. So the compiled binaries basically got slashed in half.

    The goals of Snow Leopard were improved performance, greater efficiency and the reduction of its overall memory footprint, unlike previous versions of Mac OS X which focused more on new features. Apple famously marketed Snow Leopard as having “zero new features”.[13] Its name signified its goal to be a refinement of the previous OS X version, Leopard.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_Snow_Leopard

  • Acoustic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not a programmer by any means, but I’m guessing, they are just removing old redundant features and code, but I could be very wrong here.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      a new version of a program can also move to a different set of dependencies that is shared with another program, so you don’t need to keep both around.

      • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        This wouldn’t appear like this when upgrading the system with pacman. pacman does not automatically remove orphaned dependencies during upgrades. You have to query for them and remove them explicitly as a separate operation afterwards. So in the OP what we’re seeing is the new versions of packages themselves getting smaller.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Decided to try this out on Tumbleweed. I last updated yesterday. Today I have 4 packages to upgrade and doing so will drop ruby 3.3. Looks like I also have Ruby 3.4 installed so likely I had a package depending on 3.3 and another on 3.4 and now the 3.3 has moved to 3.4. I regained a whopping 30 MB disk space!