So 50 is, superwhore?

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well there are also a few who are way above the average dragging it back up again. We need to see a distribution curve

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        This is still a bit misleading visually, because the population numbers for the bars are totalled, not distributed among the partner counts within each category. Eg. each partner count within the 2-10 partner bar has an average of ~5% of the population, which is less than the 0-partner bar, but they add up to ~45%, more than the 1-partner bar.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Oh yeah, true! Although that reveals that we’re missing fine-grained data above 0 and 1, so even with smoothing it’s not very detailed

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      For every person who fucked 30 people, you need 6 people who never had sex to bring the average back to 5. I find 5 to be impossibly low, even as someone who’s number is 5.

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Eyy… How you doin’, eh?

      (Sorry. “Beacon” and “distribution curve”? I couldn’t not.)