cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThey're rare, but they're unfortunately herelemmy.worldimagemessage-square272fedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down156cross-posted to: fedimemes@feddit.uk
arrow-up1724arrow-down1imageThey're rare, but they're unfortunately herelemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square272fedilinkcross-posted to: fedimemes@feddit.uk
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 hours agoBourgeoisie aren’t some genetically distinct group. The party supplanted the bourgeoisie and became them. I will never understand how tankies can see a small group gain control of the means of production and understand it as anything but a new bourgeoisie.
minus-squarevolodya_ilich@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 hours ago The party supplanted the bourgeoisie and became them The party didn’t have nearly enough wealth, especially not intergenerational, they were as much public workers as doctors and teachers. small group gain control of the means of production Again proving you don’t know shit about soviet historiography and democratic mechanisms
Bourgeoisie aren’t some genetically distinct group. The party supplanted the bourgeoisie and became them.
I will never understand how tankies can see a small group gain control of the means of production and understand it as anything but a new bourgeoisie.
The party didn’t have nearly enough wealth, especially not intergenerational, they were as much public workers as doctors and teachers.
Again proving you don’t know shit about soviet historiography and democratic mechanisms