TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 22 hours ago

You're losing your will to fight.

47

You're losing your will to fight.

TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 22 hours ago

I’m losing my will to fight. You’re losing your will to fight. In the last few weeks, you’ve been nothing but despair. I am trying to hold it together so I can keep up the fight. But it’s been getting harder. All the levity has been lost. I guess I got more levity from you than I realized. I don’t know how I became so dependent on you. Isolation has become the norm for us, I guess. But right now, all I know is that I can’t do this without you. You’ve gotta stay strong, and stay light. So that I can stay strong, and stay light.

Yes, you. The faceless mass.

Chat

Mr_Canard@jlai.lu
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2
arrow-down
1·
3 hours ago
You should look up what happens to people like you when there is a power shift.
- Universal Monk@lemm.ee
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  edit-2
  2 hours ago
  “People like” me? Care to clarify? There won’t be a “power shift.” There will be no uprising. There will be no revolution.
  
  Maybe you can enlighten me on what will happen to people like me. I’d love to make some more FBI reports. Go on, let’s find out.

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

613 users / day
1.41K users / week
3.46K users / month
7.38K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
2.22K subscribers
706 Posts
15.8K Comments
Modlog