Do it!

  • Dave@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes exactly. A charitable purpose only needs to meet the very generic criteria of being beneficial to the community (or the others, relieving poverty or advancing education).

    If a church is a net positive for the community, or helps those in poverty, it would still qualify. So let’s get rid of the specific religion clause and let churches prove they are a net benefit to the community.

    • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would even question whether “a church” as in catholic or lutheran or scientology etc should be granted charitable status. They have to show their branch in NZ to be benefitting the community. Their efforts elsewhere should not count.

      • Dave@lemmy.nzM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        For sure. As each church is an independent entity, each one should have to register and pass the criteria. I don’t think granting, say, the Catholic Church as one NZ entity is the right way. Instead, each of the Catholic churches around the country should apply on their own merits. Surely some will be feeding and housing the homeless and some will be using tithes to by lamborghinis so they should be assessed individually since they have individual finances.