Source Link Privacy.

Privacy test result

https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarlogic.com%2Fnews%2Fbackdoor-esp32-chip-infect-ot-devices%2F&device=mobile&location=us-ca&force=false

Tarlogic Security has detected a backdoor in the ESP32, a microcontroller that enables WiFi and Bluetooth connection and is present in millions of mass-market IoT devices. Exploitation of this backdoor would allow hostile actors to conduct impersonation attacks and permanently infect sensitive devices such as mobile phones, computers, smart locks or medical equipment by bypassing code audit controls.

Update: The ESP32 “backdoor” that wasn’t.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    None of them, that’s why the only things in my house that connect to the internet are my computers, game consoles, and cell phone

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Like I said 6 hours ago, just because I can’t mitigate all of the risk doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t mitigate as much as I reasonably can.

        My 3d printer is a fire hazard, but that’s no excuse for leaving a bunch of candles unattended.

        • targetx@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Ah I missed the other comment, my client still had a cached view apparently. And definitely true regarding mitigation, your phrasing just read funny to me :)

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Assuming you’re not joking here, if your computers are any way modern they almost certainly have a backdoor.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Obviously, but I trust my Linux mint laptop a hell of a lot better than my aunt’s XIPPLG branded wifi cat feeder that she bought off Amazon

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 minutes ago

            From what I understand, the only way to mitigate the risks relating to IME or AMD PSP is to simply not have a computer in the first place. Like I’ve said elsewhere twice now, it’s worth mitigating some risks even if we can’t mitigate all of them. I don’t want the most advanced computing device in my home to be an astrolabe.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I guarantee all off those have components from manufacturers that a government could pressure for a backdoor.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You are correct, and it doesn’t change my stance at all. It’s still worth it to mitigate risk even if you can’t mitigate all risk.

        Like, the fact that my 3d printer is already a fire hazard does not justify leaving a bunch of candles unattended