cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square461fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down112cross-posted to: technik@feddit.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.org
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square461fedilinkcross-posted to: technik@feddit.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.org
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·8 hours agoTo be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·7 hours agoIt’s called paying for the content
minus-squareEnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-24 hours agoThis. I support AI, but I don’t understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing. OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.
minus-squarewhoisearth@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 hours agoBut how will corporations like Disney survive without copywrites?! Won’t someone think about the poor corporations?! /s
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-27 hours agoWhy? Nothing they’ve shat out is good for anything anyway.
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-27 hours agoIf not, AI is dead in the US Technically, everything you write is copyrighted
minus-squaredesertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours agoYou don’t need to say anything else, I’m already happy with that outcome
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 hours agoThere are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.
minus-squareazalty@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoI’m all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 hours agoOh no, how horrible… AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm
minus-squaret0m4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoI’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data. Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoI don’t believe there’s a future in AI at all.
To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone
It’s called paying for the content
This.
I support AI, but I don’t understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.
OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.
But how will corporations like Disney survive without copywrites?! Won’t someone think about the poor corporations?!
/s
Why? Nothing they’ve shat out is good for anything anyway.
If not, AI is dead in the US
Technically, everything you write is copyrighted
You don’t need to say anything else, I’m already happy with that outcome
There are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.
I’m all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work
Oh no, how horrible… AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm
I’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data.
Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.
I don’t believe there’s a future in AI at all.