• Mkengine@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was wondering the same thing for Germany, our population is stagnating, but apparently we need 400,000 new apartments per year (according to our government). Maybe because there are more divorces and singles nowadays who want to live alone?

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany’s population has actually increased by almost four million in the past ten years, so that number of new apartments seems pretty reasonable at the moment. There will always be some homes that need replaced each year too, if they become unsuitable for living or are converted to non-residential purposes

      • Mkengine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are right, maybe the y-axis of the diagram I remember was scaled for a larger range and it looked like it was stagnating, but with those numbers it really seems reasonable.

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The numbers for Germany do often look weird after reuinification. In 2011 Germany realised it actually had 1.5 million fewer people than it thought it did. It hadn’t actually done a full census since reunification, and over 24 years in the west and 30 years in the east plus the difficulty of combining the two sets of records, errors built up

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. If more people were shaking up together. It would reduce the pressure on housing. Though I would suspect that people owning multiple houses might also have an impact on this number.