Do we really need fake images of the war?

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wag the dog territory right here

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    this won’t resound well for adobe if they’re aware and they let this happen

    but then, imagine if an artist made a drawing of a child looking at the ruins made by Israeli bombs. Would it too be a scandal?

    Art history is filled with paintings of massacres. Paintings that are considered masterpieces

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The difference is, we KNOW paintings and drawings aren’t real. We can tell by looking at them at a glance. The same can’t be said of these photorealistic images.

      • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        if we take what you say as true, then the problem is not about adobe selling generated images of actual suffering but that these images may cause confusion, disinformation.

        “for me”, if there is a problem, it lies in the aforementioned question: why do we need generated images of gaza when we have a flux of photographs, videos, writings and interviews that show/tell us the actual suffering there?

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is not when you can watch live feed from tiktok, snapchat, instegram of real people vlogging their day to day. Along with journalist.