Yeah, I feel like trusting ai is going to lead people down dangerously convincing rabbit holes
Removed by mod
I doubt you’re wrong, but the link didn’t load
Half the things in your list are just wrong falsehoods.
You, being oblivious to why Trump is a desired presidential candidate, is the symptom of isolation from opposing opinions. Likely from absorbing information only from social media, MM, and fellow democrats. It makes you unable to fathom perspectives not derived from these sources.
I’ve mostly quit social media, including FB, reddit. Etc. For some reason, I can’t quit lemme, even though it’s a trash heap of ingorant opinions. I believe it may be because this is such a hot bed of socialist, communist, and Marxist rhetoric. It’s fascinating and extremely disturbing and at the same time. On one hand, people here worry about dark agent influences working on the American public, but they don’t understand this is where it’s happening, on social media. This is easy ground for anonymous agents with nefarious intent to sway opinion… anyway, I’m rambling now.
Very uncivil of you. You are part of the majority here, nothing important or intelligent to add, just ad hominems. Lemme is a trash heap.
That’s for the invite, but no thanks. Don’t even know what comment you’re referring to.
… I used comprehension in direct response to your use of comprehension.
I’m about to just stop responding to everyone. I feel this is a losing battle…
Pointing them out is one thing. Complaining about them is another. And no, I wasn’t complaining about them.
I didn’t comment about you being nice or not. I commented about how utterly insufferable you seem to be. The reading comprehension is very low here…
Let me stop you for clarification. Is your attitude this reprehensible and insufferable in real life? Or just online?
Translation: You’re a dumb ass
Edit: sorry… y’all’ve sapped my energy with idiocy.
Ok. Thanks for your opinion.
Well, everyone can and should come to their own conclusion. One thing…
articles about Trump losing have a much stronger Central bias.
It’s about 1/3 central 2/3 left. I think that is a good way to look at that.
Haha I wanna find the depth limit of your m… ! I’m jk. Just trying to help reach the thread limit.
You’ve been wasting a lot of time/energy replying here
Hah you’re not wrong about that. I’m nearly worn out now.
I haven’t answered those topics for a few reasons. Some are more nuanced/complicated and require more effort, and like you said, I’ve “been wasting a lot of time/energy replaying” already. But no, they aren’t “minor quibbles” and totally worth arguing, but I have enough on my plate already.
IT IS A COMPREHENSION ISSUE BECAUSE WHAT YOU WROTE IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE.
I’m just about done… yall are wearing me out.
Lol, nice. Add making assumptions to that list now.
Got any more?
I can play this game…
Perhaps, but you are clearly thinking and writing like one.
That’s an opinion. You sound politically color blind. If praise isn’t being solely given to the candidate you support, sutely, he must be for the opposition.
“those of us who live in reality”
I’m not so sure you do. Trump said some of THE most inane things he’s ever said, yet you are effectively equating that to what Harris had said, which had more substance in a few words than Trump had in the whole debate.
Way to take that quote out of context and then argue something else. This is the whole sentence:
I know everyone here thinks it was a big Harris win and no one denies it, so I’m just here to tell inform yall that “those of us who live in reality” don’t consider it a big win for Harris or that Trump did badly.
I wasnt talking about the substance here. It was commentary about how it is being claimed that it was a “big loss for Trump” and/or a “major win for harris,” which it was neither. People who actually interact with other people “in the real world” have a better understanding of how people actually perceived the debate.
Right out of the Fox News talking-point playbook. And the proper spelling would be “whiny”. Unless you’re comparing her sound to a horse’s neigh.
Is it? I don’t ever watch Fox, so I wouldn’t know. Assuming and generalizing, not a good strategy.
Right out of the Fox News talking-point playbook.
Lol. Again, even. And even if it is, it’s not wrong. This place is a liberal echo chamber. The sooner you’re able to understand/accept this, the better off you will be overall.
Gay
Sorta