I think you may have misread, the wreck is about 3.8km deep (5 mile or so). It’s 690km away from the nearest cost laterally.
I think you may have misread, the wreck is about 3.8km deep (5 mile or so). It’s 690km away from the nearest cost laterally.
Yes, it’s all very good.
Nice try but I’m keeping my even more instant instant noodles to myself.
I’ll give you a hint though, the secret is in being ok with pumping boiling water into your stomach.
Yeah windows standby sucks. On platforms where the equivalent of s0 doesn’t suck, it’s awesome.
Don’t you? Instant wake is hella useful, especially if you are using a laptop as a laptop and moving between meeting rooms etc, constantly bumping between sleep and wake.
They note towards the bottom they’ve also developed a sustainable resin in place of PVA.
Not really… just a slightly higher end of gear, most of dells professional series will do it from memory, the gigabyte on my desk does it.
Yeah… tend to agree - it’s doable but OP would be reaching for some fairly hectic gear to solve a pretty small problem. Consumer monitors with PIP definitely exist and would be cheaper.
If all you’re looking to do is nicer input switching, a KVM switch would be a better solve.
Capture cards would be more useful if you wanted to record the gaming sessions. AFAIK they will always introduce latency as they are usually designed for a situation where that is fine.
I’ve been running ITX gaming builds for years, they work great and I don’t use expansion ports anyways.
My advice would be choose the case you want first. Bigger ITX cases will take standard components easily (with some limits on GPU length), but if you want Very Small and Mighty (e.g. DanCase, Fractal Design Terra), component choice becomes very important. You’ll need to consider cpu, gpu, and cooling clearances.
It’s like PC building on moderately hard mode, it’s a little more difficult but the results are worth it!
Sure, anything is possible without enough c4.
Whether it’s economical to do so and the risks of making a submerged navigation hazard are worthwhile is up for debate.
I suspect we’ll land in between - many of these rigs are far beyond where anyone is likely to see them and should be retained as is. The ones closer to the coast should probably be decommissioned or modified as you suggest with navigation markers.
There is a bit of a scandal in aus at the moment about this. Qatar asked for more international flights (they back Virgin Australia, one of 2 major domestic carriers in Australia). Government said no, for undisclosed reasons.
The “national” carrier Qantas are scumbags with the government in their pocket and likely quietly lobbied against it, but also Qatar International Airport did this to Australian citizens not that long ago:
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12817070
So it’s just kind of dickheads all the way down.
It’s easier to think about it in terms of where is the wind going.
Air moves into adjacent regions that have lower pressure. It begins everywhere but is moving towards these areas of lower pressure.
They do… 1/3rd of it is used that way.