Hi, I’m nLuLukna (en-loo-luke-nah).

  • 1 Post
  • 31 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle




  • There’s nothing wrong with those kind of bots But when you take an instance for example granitestate.social, I think that’s what it’s called, which when I was looking into it had 100,000 inactive accounts sat there doing nothing.

    These bots that have been created over the course of maybe a week could be used to spam or brigade instances. Emphasis on COULD, maybe they just sit there. Who knows?

    But many instances took to purging idle bot accounts that had been created on their instances and defedrating from instances that had excessive numbers of bots

    These idle accounts are hard to detect, so only when they appear in large quantities are they removable.

    Just to clear up really I guess, I’m not talking about a Reddit repost bot or twitter scraper, more large amounts of bot spam.


  • I want to remind everyone that Lemmy has had a bot crisis, a while ago I did some research into botted instances and I estimated something like 40% of user accounts are bots. Although this was a while ago so I’m not sure if that is remotely accurate anymore

    Many instances will have taken steps to start purging user accounts, at the scale of Lemmy, that downturn could be entirely explained by these bots being removed

    Obviously some users will leave but i do feel it’s worth noting this fact











  • Right well that makes sense. And is also a very good point. I don’t really see why you couldn’t do that. So I guess it is arbitrary. Although you then have the question of which case occurs more commonly, which is imo actually quite interesting, but also entirely pointless, since good luck showing one case to be more than the other. It’s like that door and wheel question.


  • I don’t see it mate. So you’re going to have to tell me, sorry.

    The point I’m trying to make is that using Pemdas/Bedmas is the most effiecent way of removing brackets - I actually don’t 100% know that but I doubt it creates hundreds of brackets - if thats slightly clearer.



  • nLuLukna @sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlConfusing...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah I haven no idea what I was saying when I said that, I’ve edited my comment a bit.

    On that note though using your example I think I can illistarte the point I was trying to make earlier.

    1 + (2*3) by always doing multiplication first we can remove those brackets.

    (1 + 2) * 3 can be rewritten as (1 * 3 )+ (2 * 3) so using the first rule again makes a sense. That is a crappy explaination but I think you get my gist.