• jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Evil Food Supply, and that’s a good thing.

    Looks like a cool channel, subscribed, thanks!

    That’s why semaglutide is so good

    I’ve seen some worrisome data. Semaglutide doesn’t teach people a better eating pattern, it doesn’t push people toward more satiating nutritious food. It appears to reduce hunger (nausea) but unless people eat better food they are going through a very slow from of malnutrition while they are on the drug. Eventually people need to come off the drug, and at that point they have lost a considerable amount of muscle mass (something like 40% of the weight loss on the drug is muscle mass) but haven’t necessarily improved their eating patterns.

    I think these type of drugs are a great tool for people who can’t do a health intervention, but it should be seen as a bridge to helping someone build better behaviors not as a replacement for better eating.

    This is incredibly relevant. I have family that are forever offering me the wrong type of food and drink and that’s because society just doesn’t understand.

    Be strong! This is where online communities are important to help people develop and maintain better habits.

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Semaglutide doesn’t teach people a better eating pattern, it doesn’t push people toward more satiating nutritious food.

      I can’t speak for other people but my experience with it was that it forced me to eat at regular times. Forced me into strict portion control, whereby too much and I felt nauseous and too little and I had acid reflux. This in turn meant that I had to quickly figure out what I could and couldn’t eat and made sure I was eating nutritious enough meals to get me through my days as I had to make the most of what little I could eat. Even in terms of drink, I had to cut juice and alcohol as my body just couldn’t handle anything. I’m probably the exception rather than the rule, but it changed my life and allowed me to put into action things I had always theorised about but couldn’t reconcile.

      Eventually people need to come off the drug, and at that point they have lost a considerable amount of muscle mass (something like 40% of the weight loss on the drug is muscle mass)

      Ugh, don’t get me started on how much weaker I am, but it’s something to work on.

      I think these type of drugs are a great tool for people who can’t do a health intervention, but it should be seen as a bridge to helping someone build better behaviors not as a replacement for better eating.

      Sometimes people just need help and it’s not one size fits all. This is why we need doctors that are hands on so they can understand the optimal treatment for each patient.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        it changed my life and allowed me to put into action things I had always theorised about but couldn’t reconcile.

        Wow, that is really great! Thank you for sharing your experience.

        This is why we need doctors that are hands on so they can understand the optimal treatment for each patient

        100%

        weaker I am, but it’s something to work on.

        Have you transitioned off the drugs and are on a maintenance nutrition program? I’ve done a huge amount of reading in the ketogenic / zero carb space and I’m happy to share any literature on muscle improvement and sustainment that could be helpful to you

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Have you transitioned off the drugs and are on a maintenance nutrition program? I’ve done a huge amount of reading in the ketogenic / zero carb space and I’m happy to share any literature on muscle improvement and sustainment that could be helpful to you

          I’m still on the drugs, though as I approach my one year anniversary, I suspect I’ll start having those conversations with my doctor. But please do share your findings and insights on diet. Right now, although I’m eating a balanced diet, I feel like the calorie deficit is doing the heavy lifting.

          • jetA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            But please do share your findings and insights on diet.

            Full disclosure I run the !ketogenic@dubvee.org and !carnivore@dubvee.org communities, so I have quite the bias.

            1. People following a low-carb nutritional protocol have reported better results then slgt2/glp1 inhibitors alone, especially when considering muscle wasting (a ketogenic intervention usually gains muscle)

            2. The muscle loss is thought to be due to nutritional deficits rather then the drugs themselves. Since you said your eating a balanced diet - does that mean your getting 2g per kg of ideal body weight complete (ASF or high DIAAS) protein per day?

            3. CICO is technically true, but not clinically relevant - the carbohydrate model of obesity has more clinical impact. I can send over the paper if you want the details but if the bodies hormones are allowed to operate normally (without elevated insulin) the normal hunger and satisfaction signals are sufficient to get healthy.

            4. Are you measuring your muscle over time? With a inbody scale, or dexa scan? That can be helpful

            5. As far as I’m aware a low carbohydrate diet can be combined with the drugs

            Update

            1. Sauna use has been associated with muscle retention in people who don’t exercise, this is wild speculation on my part, but the slgt2/glp1 drug muscle loss may be attenuated by frequent sauna use - if you have it available
            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              People following a low-carb nutritional protocol have reported better results then slgt2/glp1 inhibitors alone, especially when considering muscle wasting (a ketogenic intervention usually gains muscle)

              I agree that carbs aren’t great, but they do have their place and can be vital to overcoming diabetes in some patients.

              The muscle loss is thought to be due to nutritional deficits rather then the drugs themselves. Since you said your eating a balanced diet - does that mean your getting 2g per kg of ideal body weight complete (ASF or high DIAAS) protein per day?

              Probably not to be honest. I’m struggling to get enough protein.

              the carbohydrate model of obesity has more clinical impact.

              What is this?

              I can send over the paper if you want the details

              Please do

              Are you measuring your muscle over time? With a inbody scale, or dexa scan? That can be helpful

              I haven’t. I’ve never even heard of a dexa scale.

              As far as I’m aware a low carbohydrate diet can be combined with the drugs

              I think, especially in a cooler climate such as the UK, low carbs makes sense as your body doesn’t have the sun to burn through the carbs (and starch) as efficiently.

              Sauna use has been associated with muscle retention in people who don’t exercise, this is wild speculation on my part, but the slgt2/glp1 drug muscle loss may be attenuated by frequent sauna use - if you have it available

              I’ve actually been thinking about visiting a sauna, so this is timely advice, thank you.

              • jetA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I agree that carbs aren’t great, but they do have their place and can be vital to overcoming diabetes in some patients.

                I’m aware of the Randel cycle (not a cycle) and how the potato/mcdougal/rice diets can help some people reduce their insulin resistance. However, I don’t think there is any necessity for a carbohydrate in human nutrition, at least not published in literature. In so far as some low glycemic carbohydrates can help a patient displace more glycemic carbohydrates I would agree it is a valid tool. If we look at type 2 diabetes as a state of carbohydrate intolerance (which it really is because of blood glucose being driven directly by carbohydrate consumption) then it is not advisable for any type 2 diabetic to incorporate carbohydrates in their protocol.

                This is a interesting paper (and my notes) on the absolute requirements of carbohydrates in human nutrition: Paper - Confronting myths: relative and absolute requirements of dietary carbohydrates and glucose as metabolic fuels. - 2024

                I’m struggling to get enough protein.

                Fight fight!

                the carbohydrate model of obesity has more clinical impact.

                What is this?

                I can send over the paper if you want the details

                Please do

                Paper - The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity - Beyond “Calories In, Calories Out” - 2018

                I really need to move my notes off of lemm.ee this weekend. TLDR on the paper insulin is the driver of obesity, reducing insulin is the solution to obesity (allowing the body to enact its amazing homeostasis capabilites)

                I haven’t. I’ve never even heard of a dexa scale.

                You can use any capacitive scale that estimates muscle mass to give you a broad indicator of progression or retention. Inbody scanners are fairly common at gyms, some places have dexa body composition scanners which are even more complete, but any measurement from any system is good enough here to milestone progression. It could even be weekly hand grip strength measurements.

                I think, especially in a cooler climate such as the UK, low carbs makes sense as your body doesn’t have the sun to burn through the carbs (and starch) as efficiently.

                I’m not familiar with any mechanism between sunlight and carbohydrate mobilization. Perhaps just warmer climates make being outside nicer so people are more active?

                I’ve actually been thinking about visiting a sauna, so this is timely advice, thank you.

                Start slow! and enjoy it (make sure not to take your glasses into the sauna, I melted mine).


                Happy to talk at length and get into the details about any of the above.

                  • jetA
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Always happy to share! I’m genuinely happy you read what i wrote!

                    KPD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketosis-prone_diabetes ?

                    You might find this interesting Ketosis, ketoacidosis and very-low-calorie diets: putting the record straight - 2011

                    TLDR: DKA and Ketosis are distinct biological states, and eating carbohydrates does not provide a benefit in avoiding DKA. i.e. DKA is resolved with insulin and not injecting/consuming glucose.

                    Update - Above you said your on a SLGT2 inhibitor, which does decrease insulin levels, so there is a DKA risk with that medication by itself, with your KPD condition I agree its probably not great to combine SLGT2i medication and a strict ketogenic diet

                    3.5.2.2.2 Medications that increase ketoacidosis risk - SGLT2 inhibitors: These medications carry a risk of euglycaemic ketoacidosis. TCR alone cannot cause ketoacidosis, but it may enhance the risk posed by SGLT2i by lowering insulin concentrations because insulin inhibits ketone formation. SGLT2i-induced ketoacidosis may occur with normal BG concentrations, and this heightens the risk of ketoacidosis going unrecognised. It is worth noting that a VLCD (typically less than 50 g of carbohydrate a day) can produce a physiologically normal state of ketosis, that should not be confused with the pathological state of diabetic ketoacidosis. Despite recent literature supporting slight cardiovascular risk reduction and renal protection of SGLT2i, it is recommended that SGLT2i are used with caution in those adhering to a low carbohydrate eating plan. It is appropriate to stop SGLT2i in many cases, particularly in those adhering to a VLCD (30–50 g/day). A GLP-1 agonist is a safer choice as a second-line agent after metformin. See Murray et al. [299] for an excellent review of the physiology of an LCD mimicking many effects of SGLT2i - From Ketogenic : The Science of Therapeutic Carbohydrate Restriction in Human Health