Even knowing about it, each time I look deeper into it, I realize it’s even worse than I had thought it was.
Key takeaways from skimming that link:
Agencies assume the oral route is the primary one of concern, but most BPA consumed orally ends up processed by the liver into a form that doesn’t bind to estrogen receptors. This is not the case for BPA absorbed through the skin.
Safety assumptions for skin absorbed BPA assume best case scenarios. If any factors are less than ideal, actual absorption could be significantly higher than the numbers used to determine it’s “safe”.
If you work in retail where you need to handle these regularly, you should wear gloves because those safety assumptions also seem to mainly consider the habits of customers who receive one with a purchase, not the people who need to rip one off for the customer and another for the business and then maybe handle ones to do paperwork when closing the till.
Also it didn’t really go into the amount that might get airborne and inhaled due to handling those receipts.
Hopefully it’s not a big deal, but that is currently more based on wishful thinking than any real scientific backing.
It was a joke about college kids and stimulant use, im not gonna read the whole paper. I still think its far more likely for someone to roll a receipt into a coke straw than a drinking straw. You seem like an unhappy person lol.
Wait, what?
Ooof. Just searched this myself:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5453537/
E: LMFAO someone used their receipt as a drinking straw
I’m sure some idiots rolled their ciggies with them.
Even knowing about it, each time I look deeper into it, I realize it’s even worse than I had thought it was.
Key takeaways from skimming that link:
Agencies assume the oral route is the primary one of concern, but most BPA consumed orally ends up processed by the liver into a form that doesn’t bind to estrogen receptors. This is not the case for BPA absorbed through the skin.
Safety assumptions for skin absorbed BPA assume best case scenarios. If any factors are less than ideal, actual absorption could be significantly higher than the numbers used to determine it’s “safe”.
If you work in retail where you need to handle these regularly, you should wear gloves because those safety assumptions also seem to mainly consider the habits of customers who receive one with a purchase, not the people who need to rip one off for the customer and another for the business and then maybe handle ones to do paperwork when closing the till.
Also it didn’t really go into the amount that might get airborne and inhaled due to handling those receipts.
Hopefully it’s not a big deal, but that is currently more based on wishful thinking than any real scientific backing.
It doesnt say a drinking straw, im gonna guess someonr got a little something extra with their cocaine that they weren’t expecting.
Removed by mod
It says “rolled into straw” actually. Kinda ironic you’re calling me illiterate
Good grief, dumbass. It’s literally written in the paper. Search “drinking straw”, dumbass.
It was a joke about college kids and stimulant use, im not gonna read the whole paper. I still think its far more likely for someone to roll a receipt into a coke straw than a drinking straw. You seem like an unhappy person lol.
Yep. 😎