• Zectivi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I never knew there was a difference. Is it just the nacelle placement and the little “hump” just aft of the saucer?

        • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          form drag is proportional to:

          • The denisty of the medium.
          • The velocity of the moving body (squared).

          Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3…

          However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much

          This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30.

          So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can’t complain, and I’m pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.

          • Zectivi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.

            Ithis image

    • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Moving mass towards the center to reduce rotational inertia and increase manoeuvrability! Little changes can bring great improvements in space battles.

    • timicin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      checkout out the treball channel on youtube; they did an entire one hour episode on the differences. tldr: they’re all extremely minor and there’s lots of them.