Mod removed my comment because it questioned the core premise of a meme.
I don’t think such a comment should be removed.
post: https://piefed.world/post/361286
Account that had deleted comment: !muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com
Mod removed my comment because it questioned the core premise of a meme.
I don’t think such a comment should be removed.
post: https://piefed.world/post/361286
Account that had deleted comment: !muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com
Their admin is an open transphobe.
You also say that about me… : https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&modId=3&userId=1364396 That is a position I disagree with, obviously I don’t think I am.
It would be helpful to see content on HC that demonstrates why they are discriminated against and censured so widely
do they export their beliefs to your instance, and cause trouble for your people?
And here you are, sealioning.
Interesting.
That is reductive thinking - we are in a moderator review discussion which requires us to look at both moderator and commenter actions.
In this discussion the grand parent commenter used the users instance as a factor, and I’m asking for evidence for the instance censures, which is reasonable. If we are saying being a member of a instance is enough to get moderated then its reasonable to establish, WITH EVIDENCE, that the instance censures are based on actions rather then speculations.
Asking a question in good faith is not sealioning. You really really need to learn how to use that word correctly.