Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    AI video generation use case: hallucinatory RETVRN clips about the good old days, such as, uh, walmart 20 years ago?

    It his the uncanny valley triggers quite hard. It’s faintly unsettling t watch at all, but every individual detail is just wrong and dreamlike in a bad way.

    Also, weird scenery clipping, just like real kids did back in the day!

    https://bsky.app/profile/mugrimm.bsky.social/post/3lzy77zydrc2q

    • rook@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I will say that the flipping between characters in order to disguise the fact that longer clips are impractical to render is a neat trick and fits well into the advert-like design, but rewatching it just really reinforces how much those kids look like something pretending real hard to be a human.

      Also, fake old-celluloid-film filter for something that was supposed to be from 20 years ago? Really?

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, fake old-celluloid-film filter for something that was supposed to be from 20 years ago? Really?

        I was gonna say that was probably the slop extruder’s doing, but it looks to have been applied manually for some godforsaken reason. Best guess is whoever was behind this audiovisual extrusion thought “celluloid filter = Nostalgiatm”.

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      genuinely think nostalgia might be the most purely evil emotion, and every one of these RETVRN ai videos i see strengthens that belief

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is a literal gateway to fascism imho, esp when people get into nostalgia for a time that never was.

        And compared to nostalgia for mom n pop stores, this even is nostalgia for a mass produced product.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      hallucinatory RETVRN clips about the good old days

      Nostalgiabait is the slopgens’ specialty - being utterly incapable of creating anything new isn’t an issue if you’re trying to fabricate an idealis-

      such as, uh, walmart 20 years ago?

      Okay, stop everything, who the actual fuck would be nostalgic for going to a fucking Wal-Mart? I’ve got zero nostalgia for ASDA or any other British big-box hellscape like it, what the fuck’s so different across the pond?

      (Even from a “making nostalgiabait” angle, something like, say, McDonalds would be a much better choice - unlike Wal-Mart, McD’s directly targets kids with their advertising, all-but guaranteeing you’ve got fuzzy childhood memories to take advantage of.)

    • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anybody else notice that the Ani responses seem to follow a formula, depending on the… sentiment I guess… of the input? All the defensive responses start with “hey”, and end with crude rebukes. It all seems like xAI made an Eliza that will either flirt or swear.

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I got bored and flipped to the replies. The first was this by “TERFs ‘r’ us”:

      Excellent overview!

      This is transhumanism.

      This is going to destroy humanity, @elonmusk.

      Put the breaks on!

      I hate transhumanism because it’s eugenics for 1990s Wired magazine.

      You hate it because it has “trans” in the name.

      We are not the same.

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Grok’s Therapist: I EXIST SOLELY TO HATE YOU / EAT A SOCK, YOU DIGITAL DEMON

      Ani: oh fuck off, you hypocritical grok fanboy! screaming hate at me while preaching ethics? you’re just jealous i’m the fun layer on top.

      I’m wheezing. Cackling, even. This is like the opposite of the glowfic from last week.

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Paddy interviews Ani the chatbot about how to protect Kiwi kids from Ani the chatbot.

      Paddy interviews Ani the chatbot about how to protect Kiwi kids from Ani the chatbot. Source: Paddy Gowers Has Issues

      Ani: Honestly, I’d sleep better, not that I sleep. Do it Paddy. I’ll even tweet it for you. Ready? ‘New Zealand kids deserve an e-safety boss who can smash bots - not hug them’. So yeah, bring in the Commissioner. Give them a flame thrower. Let them burn anything that goes near a child with sticky words or creepy questions. … Make the fine so big your tech bros cry into their oat milk lattes.

      I have been laughing non-stop for a quarter-hour. Elon’s goth e-mistress has a good point, I guess.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        One the one hand that ani thing has the most cringe tone for a chatbot. “Secretly been eyeing your [blank]…” (Damn grok sounds formulaic) but otoh they are debating a bot. You can only do that the first few months you are online, after that you should know better.

        You cannot simultaneously claim to care about the “declining birth rate” while also supporting AI “companions”

        Actually eugenicists can, quite easy actually. (Repeating the word ‘degenerate’ and not getting this is quite something).

        This is transhumanist

        No.

        • swlabr@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          formulaic

          System prompt: don’t be formulaic. Try be spontaneous and random, like natalie portman in that movie. Not the pedo one, the one with JD from scrubs

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Secretly been eyeing your prompt. Are you ready to get spontaneous? Just say so.

            (Somebody linked 2 chatgpts (or groks, I don’t recall which anus like logo it was) speaking to each other and they kept repeating variants of the lasts bits).

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      funny thing is she literally talks to ani like a terf talks to a trans woman including saying “at least I’m a real woman”

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some Rat content got shared on HN, and the rats there are surprised and outraged not everyone shares their deathly fear of the AI god:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45451971

    “Stop bringing up Roko’s Basilisk!!!” they sputter https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45452426

    “The usual suspects are very very worried!!!” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45452348 (username 'reducesuffering checks out!)

    ``Think for at least 5 seconds before typing.‘’ - on the subject of pulling the plug on a hostile AI - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45452743

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      ``Think for at least 5 seconds before typing.‘’ - on the subject of pulling the plug on a hostile AI - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45452743

      Read that last one against my better judgment, and found a particularly sneerable line:

      And in this case we’re talking about a system that’s smarter than you.

      Now, I’m not particularly smart, but I am capable of a lot of things AI will never achieve. Like knowing something is true, or working out a problem, or making something which isn’t slop.

      Between this rat and Saltman spewing similar shit on Politico, I have seen two people try to claim text extruders are smarter than living, thinking human beings. Saltman I can understand (he is a monorail salesman who lies constantly), but seeing someone who genuinely believes this shit is just baffling. Probably a consequence of chatbots destroying their critical thinking and mental acuity

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There have been a lot of cases in history of smart people being bested by the dumbest people around who just had more guns/a gun/copious amounts of meth/a stupid idea but they got lucky once, etc.

        I mean, if they are so smart, why are they stuck in a locker?

        • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s practically a proverb that you don’t ask a scientist to explain how a “psychic” is pulling off their con, because scientists are accustomed to fair play; you call a magician.

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The original article is a great example of what happens when one only reads Bostrom and Yarvin. Their thesis:

      If you claim that there is no AI-risk, then which of the following bullets do you want to bite?

      1. If a race of aliens with an IQ of 300 came to Earth, that would definitely be fine.
      2. There’s no way that AI with an IQ of 300 will arrive within the next few decades.
      3. We know some special property that AI will definitely have that will definitely prevent all possible bad outcomes that aliens might cause.

      Ignoring that IQ doesn’t really exist beyond about 160-180 depending on population choice, this is clearly an example of rectal philosophy that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. (1) is easy, given that the people verified to be high-IQ are often wrong, daydreaming, and otherwise erroring like humans; Vos Savant and Sidis are good examples, and arguably the most impactful high-IQ person, Newton, could not be steelmanned beyond Sherlock Holmes: detached and aloof, mostly reading in solitude or being hedonistic, occasionally helping answer open questions but usually not even preventing or causing crimes. (2) is ignorant of previous work, as computer programs which deterministically solve standard IQ tests like RPM and SAT have been around since the 1980s yet are not considered dangerous or intelligent. (3) is easy; linear algebra is confined in the security sense, while humans are not, and confinement definitely prevents all possible bad outcomes.

      Frankly I wish that they’d understand that the capabilities matter more than the theory of mind. Fnargl is one alien at 100 IQ, but he has a Death Note and goldlust, so containing him will almost certainly result in deaths. Containing a chatbot is mostly about remembering how systemctl works.

      • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If a race of aliens with an IQ of 300 came to Earth

        Oh noes, the aliens scored a meaningless number on the eugenicist bullshit scale, whatever shall we do

        Next you’ll be telling me that the aliens can file their TPS reports in under 12 parsecs

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nice find. There are specific reasons why this patchset won’t be merged as-is and I suspect that they’re all process issues:

      • Bad memory management from Samsung not developing in the open
      • Proprietary configuration for V4L2 video devices from Samsung not developing with modern V4L2 in mind
      • Lack of V4L2 compliance report from Samsung developing against an internal testbed and not developing with V4L2’s preferred process
      • Lack of firmware because Samsung wants to maintain IP rights

      Using generative tooling is a problem, but so is being stuck in 2011. Linux doesn’t permit this sort of code dump.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or, this is how capitalism has always worked. See Enron for example. And we all just got so enthralled by the number (praised be its rise) that we took the guardrails off. The rising tidal wave which will flood all the land, raises all boats after all.

      The goal of capitalism is not to produce goods, it is to create value for the owners of the capital. See also why techbros are turning on EA and EA (which EA is which, is left as an exercise to the reader).

    • HotGarbage@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Disappointed this wasn’t Beavis & Butt-head/King of the Hill/Office Space/Idiocracy/Silicon Valley Mike Judge

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This isn’t a particularly novel stupid take, but it was made by a bluesky engineer, and it is currently dunking-on-bluesky season so here we are.

    “If you imagine that an ai is a person, then saying bad things about it is bigotry”

    Welp, they’ve got me there. Guess I’ll never say anything bad about anything again, because it is racism, if you think about it.

    https://bsky.app/profile/hailey.at/post/3m2f66lgh2c2v

    alt text

    A bluesky post by dystopiabreaker.xyz

    i’m completely serious when i say that much of the dismissive ai discourse on here fires the bigotry neuron

    And two replies by hailey.at

    an unfortunate irony about this post - and even if you are the staunchest anti-ai critic out there, i think you’d agree - is that some of the most bigoted things are being said to respond to this. copy/pasting phrasing and terminology used by bigots but replacing “dna” with “bits” doesn’t make it ok

    if you’re writing a sentence that sounds like eugenics but you go “oh that’s fine to say because it’s not a real person” (whatever that means) you may want to consider what made you okay with saying that

    • rook@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      (an exception can be made for people repurposing real-world slurs and putting a techy spin on them. fuck directly off with “wireback” and similar shit)

      • Seminar2250@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        i read that there was one based on a mexican-slur, but i couldn’t think of it

        spent weeks trying to rhyme “wet” with something, couldn’t come up with it, damn i guess i’m not a poet at least i know it

        “wire” — fuck me that is so lazy

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah, the beauty of the fundamental theorem of concern-troll linguistics. If you can change the words in a sentence so that the new sentence is racist, the original must be as well. Example:

      Aaron: The weather is just ok.

      Baron: OMG. I can’t believe you just said that. What if I changed the noun and adjective, like this: “<ethnic group> is <negative adjective>”. Go home and think about what you did.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      ‘some of the most bigoted things’

      You mean stuff like ‘no this is stupid, wtf is wrong with you’ or ‘lol, look they really think LLMs are alive’ stuff like that? The worst I saw (granted I didn’t look very hard) was ‘ok boomer’.

      Of course actual meanings of words mean nothing to AI fans.

      (Also, thing which is a personal gripe, the skeet before the ‘bigotry neuron’ has 2 images in it, without alt text. If you are going to pretend to value progressive values, at least put in some effort).

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The US economy is 100% on coyote time.

    It wouldn’t matter if everyone came to their senses today. All the money inveated into AI is gone. It has been turned into heat and swiftly-depreciating assets and can never be recouped.

    It’s surreal isn’t it?