I love how Latin America is not considered part of “the West”
🇷🇸🇷🇸Србија број један!!!🇷🇸🇷🇸
the entire collective west
only uses north america and part of evropa
i feel kinda triggered
global north would have been better
“Five Eyes & Friends”
“The collective West” = “the international community” = USA+Canada+Australia+EU+Japan+South Korea
The UN has never voted on this issue
https://digitallibrary.un.org/search?c=Voting+Data&cc=Voting+Data&ln=en
Entry 4069723 in the digital library is for A/C.3/79/L.2, the 79 is the session, we are currently at 80. The one mentioned in the post is A/C.3/80/L.2, for which the voting happened Friday (2025-11-14), and the voting data is not yet available.
Was your link supposed to prove the opposite of what you wrote in your comment?
https://digitallibrary.un.org/search?c=Voting+Data&cc=Voting+Data&ln=en
https://digitallibrary.un.org/search?c=Voting+Data&cc=Voting+Data&ln=en&p=nazism
If you expected people to fall for your confident incorrectness, you’ve come to the wrong place.
If you search for “Nazism” it shows up. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4069723
It’s voted on every year, so you can track the changes in attitudes in different places.Fair enough, I looked at the last votes since op claims it was voted on a few days ago which as far as I can tell it wasn’t
Correction though: they don’t vote on it every year
They vote on amendments proposed by nations
Not changing last years resolution.
The question then is: what did the amendment change?
Last year it was simply adding a paragraph
Why did they double down on being wrong instead of (1) doing the research before commenting or (2) shutting the fuck up?
West: We are against this resolution because Russia trying to use it to weaken Ukraine.
Global South: But why would it weaken Ukraine?
West: Because Russia wants it.
Global South: But WHY tho? Why would combating Nazism in itself weaken Ukraine?
West: Errr…cuz…well…Russia. If Russia wants something it has to be bad, yeah. Russia bad, very very bad.
The “West” has quite clearly argued that the text as-is reduces the fight against Nazism as a very one-dimensional “good vs bad”. And since Russia justified its invasion of Ukraine as a “denazification effort”, the resolution seems to justify the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Because of this, the following text was added as an amendment by Australia this year:
notes with alarm that the Russian Federation has sought to justify its territorial aggression against Ukraine on the purported basis of eliminating neo-Nazism, and underlines that the pretextual use of neo-Nazism to justify territorial aggression seriously undermines genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism.
Russia was very much against this and condemned the move to add this. It was adopted anyway in a major loss for Russia.
It should be mentioned that the special rapporteur cited in the resolution was also against this resolution as a whole, calling it a “blatant instrumentalization of serious human rights concerns”.
The EU stated the following when Russia put this up for a vote last year:
Our joint fight against contemporary forms of extremist and totalitarian ideologies, including neo-Nazism, is and remains a key priority. The EU stands firmly against all forms of antisemitism, which is incompatible with the core values and principles on which the EU is founded. The EU and its Member States have taken extensive legal and policy measures to combat acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
We support and encourage a constructive discussion in the context of the global rise in neo-Nazism and antisemitism. This resolution, on the contrary, abuses this agenda and continues to put an emphasis in a selective and twisted manner on issues that in essence are far from combatting racism and discrimination. It is a thinly veiled attempt by the Russian Federation to promote its own distorted version of history under the guise of combating neo-Nazism. It is important to remember that for many European countries the end of the Second World War did not bring freedom but further occupation and exploitation, more repression and crimes against humanity by other totalitarian regimes.
We strongly condemn the politically motivated misuse of the anti-Nazism narrative, and unequivocally reject the inaccurate and misleading use of the term ‘denazification’ to justify Russia’s inhumane, cruel and illegal war of aggression against Ukraine. This undermines genuine efforts to combat neo-Nazism. As does turning a resolution that should be dealing with a serious issue into a vehicle for propaganda and disinformation. As the aggression against Ukraine continues, we have seen the Russian Federation continuing to misuse and abuse UN fora to spread this false narrative.
The European Union remains fully committed to the global fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, antisemitism, anti-Muslim hatred, and related intolerance.
All states that have voted against have put out similar statements, saying they agree with the sentiment but not with the resolution itself.
What you’re outlining is the vacuousness of the liberal mask that the western empire wears (and you are taking the mask’s words at face value, rather than looking at what’s behind it). Russia is actually in the fight on the side against nazism and has been before historically. The western empire is in the fight on the side of nazis and has been before historically. That the western empire is sprawling enough as an empire to hide behind proxies does not make them any less of a material supporter of nazism. The same with various terrorist groups they back.
So a statement like:
The European Union remains fully committed to the global fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, antisemitism, anti-Muslim hatred, and related intolerance.
Is sort of like a serial killer saying, “I remain committed to the dignity, safety, and preservation of all human life.” While claiming that a resolution against serial killing is being used to “justify territorial aggression”.
These are seriously committed pathological liars of entities that we are dealing with. Naturally the western empire is going to try to DARVO its way into being seen as “the good guys” because having popular support makes it easier to get away with what they do. But the documented realities consistently contradict their lies. Neither Russia, nor Ukraine, wanted war. The west turned Ukraine into a proxy of its expansionist interests and made war inevitable. Even still, they tried to find peace and the west sabotaged it. Russia tries to call out the real neo-nazi influence that the west bolstered in Ukraine. The west denies and dehumanizes Russia and being Russian.
These representatives of the western empire are practiced war mongers who have been orchestrating coups for decades, on top of the hundreds of years worth of colonialism prior to that. It’s high time people stop taking what they say at face value, in good faith. I’m not even telling you to disbelieve everything they say, as they might tell you to do with Russia or China or any other entity they’ve decided is a pariah today. I’m just telling you to stop having blind trust in them.
All states that have voted against have put out similar statements, saying they agree with the sentiment but not with the resolution itself
Yet none of them put up their own versions.
No, because they feel like this resolution that Russia puts up every year is basically performative and unnecessary, as the resolution text basically says “let’s remain committed to fighting Nazism”, which they weren’t going to stop doing anyway.
It’s a bit like how putting up a resolution “against murder” every year seems like a bit of a performative waste of time. No state was going to say “well ackshually, Nazism was a pretty sweet gig”.
So instead of saying. “Yes, whatever, murdering is ofc wrong, here’s my vote” you keep coming up with convoluted statements about “black and white” and bending over backwards to explain why you don’t actually condemn murder?
Haven’t it ever occurred to you, that they could have voted “yes” and THEN issued a statement that “it does not absolve Russia…” etc.? Try to think why they haven’t done that will you?
But they did condemn it. But they’re not going to support a resolution brought forward by a serial killer.
They’re not going to go along with Russia’s performative bullshit that only serves to validate their reasoning to go killing in Ukraine. And when Australia added that whole text about “what Russia is doing is bad for the fight against Nazism” Russia got extremely pissy about it.
Why bother voting yes on a PR piece that does nothing in the fight against Nazism?
well ackshually
Your entire post is just “well ackshually”
which they weren’t going to stop doing anyway.
Dunno, arming nazis in Ukraine kinda means they have stopped.
Except the resolution is necessary because the US and EU keep arming, funding and supporting literal Nazis. You do need resolutions against murder when you have people who refuse to acknowledge that murder is happening and continue support murderers.
Will the green votes stop arming, finding and supporting Nazis through this motion now?
The green countries don’t have an issue with this resolution precisely because they aren’t currently funding and arming Nazis.
They never did. NATO countries are the main culprits when it comes to aiding and abetting Nazism.
People need to learn that calling NATO the Nazi arming and training organization is only half a joke.
The European Union remains fully committed to their global fight against humanity. They are smooth-talking liars and genocidal neoliberals.
Serbia once again showing it’s surrounded by fascists.
Now? These votes happen almost every year
Yeah but EU first time voted openly against, before they abstained.
Post this on image on reddit but edit the title and wording to say it’s an alt-history 1942 map where the western allies join the axis and see if anyone notices.
“But if you close your eyes. Nothing changed that all”
Welcome to the fourth reich/the new axis.
What are you talking about? The entire international community voted against it (/s) whats this “west” you speak of?
Is the infographic wrong or what, does my country (coloured green) not count as part of the international community?
A joke how often in liberal news articles and just hedgemonic media, the international community is just north america excluding mexico, Europe, South Korea, Japan, and Oceanic countries, ignoring every other country in the world including major ones like Russia, India, China, Brazil, Iran, etc
No, if your country is green then it is not part of the so-called “international community”.
Im making a joke [that being that news articles will say “international community does x” when the international community is basically just the west, ignoring Russia, China, and the rest of the global south]
Guess I need to see news articles more frequently, to be able to get that joke.
But yeah, nice one
wtf ireland??? Even israel voted in favor of this.
De Valera denounced reports of Bergen-Belsen concentration camp as “anti-national propaganda”; according to Paul Bew, this was not out of disbelief but rather because the Holocaust undermined the assumptions underlying Irish neutrality: moral equivalence between the Allies and the Axis, and the idea that the Irish were the most persecuted people in Europe.[52]
L O L
Westerners Oppose Racism Challenge (IMPOSSIBLE; GONE WRONG)
L Georgia by the way. I expected this from all the other assholes, didn’t expect it from you.
L Greece too. They have had a civil war for this…
L Ireland too. SMH.
