lol mao wasn’t doing shit for international socialism since the sino soviet split.
“The Cavalry” was the Soviets under Khruschev and Cuba under Fidel. That’s it man. That’s what we had.
Both of our chronology being off is indeed crazy. My point remains that China has not been the go to for intervention on behalf of international communism.
Agreed, they shouldn’t rock the boat right now. There’s whispers of DPRK arms in Palestine, which is good, but more than that and they’d be in serious trouble. Increased trade with Russia and China has worked out well for them recently, they aren’t in a position to put that in risk.
lol mao wasn’t doing shit for international socialism since the sino soviet split. “The Cavalry” was the Soviets under Khruschev and Cuba under Fidel. That’s it man. That’s what we had.
Wasn’t Mao arming and providing training for the PLO during the 60s?
He did plus sending 1 million soldiers to korean and vietnam war.
The vietnam he would later invade. And I don’t know íf you’re aware of when the Korean war and the Sino soviet split took place.
Wow, Mao invaded Vietnam 3 years after his dead? Juche necromancy is crazy.
Both of our chronology being off is indeed crazy. My point remains that China has not been the go to for intervention on behalf of international communism.
A valid counter example that is especially relevant.
DPRK as well.
The DPRK did get involved but won’t any longer. Not since the soviet union fell.
I was referring to the DPRK being a part of the “cavalry” along with Cuba and the soviets.
That’s what I’m saying. They used to be, but they haven’t been since the soviet union fell. Their entire situation is too precarious.
Agreed, they shouldn’t rock the boat right now. There’s whispers of DPRK arms in Palestine, which is good, but more than that and they’d be in serious trouble. Increased trade with Russia and China has worked out well for them recently, they aren’t in a position to put that in risk.