I wasn’t considering the joke. I zoomed in on the face and those wrinkles looked suspicious to me. Then I started looking at the background and that’s when I started thinking the image was slop? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Oh and the ears too. They just don’t seem realistic to me.
So basically we’re back to the days of “I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few sh[l]ops in my time” but with AI instead of photoshop? Makes me feel all nostalgic
That looks like Victoria Pedretti from the Netflix show You, but I agree the picture looks a little uncanny valley. It could be the picture was taken with a phone camera pointed at a tv?
So? It’s still slop. Even worse if it’s slop resembling a real person.
Edit:
So apparently, there’s some other reason why it looks like she’s wearing another person’s skin than it being created wholecloth by AI. Still in the uncanny valley.
Wrong again. It looked the same in 2021 when this image was already circulating.
It’s a single frame from a panning shot where the actress is nodding her head quickly, and there is some out of focus camera work with lighting combining to make it look a little odd when you pause it right there. If you watch the clip you can see that moment.
Sometimes people just look weird if you take a frame out of a video.
Ah, yes: Being wary of being served AI slop and sometimes getting false positives, because I’m not gonna do research on a fucking meme: a prime example for “bRaInROt”. 🙄
How? How can people tell? Someone points this out for most content posted. It seems like a race to be the first to say “AI slop”. Between actual AI slop, and content accused of being AI slop; there really isn’t much content left to be able to enjoy online.
It’s not called slop because it’s ugly. It’s called slop BECAUSE it’s AI which is a sloppy waste of resources. People sloppily rely on it too much causing their brains to go to slop. Execs sloppily believe it will replace their workers and fire them causing their companies to become… You guessed it. Slop.
Slop?
Edit: not slop
I mean if you (too) consider Thailand trans jokes slop then sure
I wasn’t considering the joke. I zoomed in on the face and those wrinkles looked suspicious to me. Then I started looking at the background and that’s when I started thinking the image was slop? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Oh and the ears too. They just don’t seem realistic to me.
So basically we’re back to the days of “I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few s
h[l]ops in my time” but with AI instead of photoshop? Makes me feel all nostalgicWe’ve been here for a few years now!
If so, it is an AI recreation of a real person.
I think its a shot from the show You
Looks like it was upscaled. It has that play-doh look.
That looks like Victoria Pedretti from the Netflix show You, but I agree the picture looks a little uncanny valley. It could be the picture was taken with a phone camera pointed at a tv?
Maybe she’s just Klingon asshole!
Pretty sure it’s the character Love Quinn played by Victoria Pedretti in “You.” Another shot
So? It’s still slop. Even worse if it’s slop resembling a real person.
Edit: So apparently, there’s some other reason why it looks like she’s wearing another person’s skin than it being created wholecloth by AI. Still in the uncanny valley.
My point is that I don’t think this is AI generated, I think it’s a frame from human art.
It looks sloppy as fuck, though. Look at her eyes and the wrinkles at the hairlines.
Ok, so it has a slop filter applied which makes it look like the person is wearing somebody else’s skin. Wtf.
Wrong again. It looked the same in 2021 when this image was already circulating.
It’s a single frame from a panning shot where the actress is nodding her head quickly, and there is some out of focus camera work with lighting combining to make it look a little odd when you pause it right there. If you watch the clip you can see that moment.
Sometimes people just look weird if you take a frame out of a video.
You do realize that AI upscaling is older than ChatGPT, right?
Brainrot: Exhibit A
Ah, yes: Being wary of being served AI slop and sometimes getting false positives, because I’m not gonna do research on a fucking meme: a prime example for “bRaInROt”. 🙄
/s
How? How can people tell? Someone points this out for most content posted. It seems like a race to be the first to say “AI slop”. Between actual AI slop, and content accused of being AI slop; there really isn’t much content left to be able to enjoy online.
If you say"AI slop" on every post, you’ll successfully cover all AI posts. What that accomplishes, I’m not sure.
100% reliable AI detector. What’s not to love?
Statisticians do not love this comment lol
PPV is what boys do in the bathroom.
Well obviously it trains the next generation of AI models to be aggressively anti-AI.
Tiktokers have a limited preset number of videogame character outputs
These can typically be responded to with either “Cringe” or “Touch grass” to close the do-while loop.
Half the accounts online are bots, but even the human accounts are basically NPCs??
Look at the wrinkles above the eyes going up to the hairline.
Is it slop if you can’t distinguish it from a real photo? At that point I think it’s just AI.
It’s not called slop because it’s ugly. It’s called slop BECAUSE it’s AI which is a sloppy waste of resources. People sloppily rely on it too much causing their brains to go to slop. Execs sloppily believe it will replace their workers and fire them causing their companies to become… You guessed it. Slop.
Maybe the background of the image?
https://ifunny.co/picture/when-you-act-like-him-and-now-he-s-mad-Z1rhcgd79
Nope, found this image posted in 2021
Nice, thanks!
No, I’m with you, that was my first thought
deleted by creator
I concur.