Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post, there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
So facebook (I’ll never call it the other name, get fucked zuckyboi) decided their LLM is so good that obviously they have to force it on everyone with an icon in your face you can never turn off[0].
Figured I’d give it a try via support channel/address, their response is even more insulting than you might guess:
[0] - of course when it doesn’t see enough adoption they’ll probably start trying to force use of it in even sneakier/controlling ways
You can share feedback and tell us about your support experience by completing this [three question survey.](https://www.whatsapp.com/survey/......)lol. the sheer fucking hubris.
Ah yes, tell me again about the novel useful things genML can do. I seem to remember something about it helping people?
just reminded again of: What if the moon got mad?
This is almost the plot of The Fifth Season, a hugo winner from a while back.
I read this as The Fifth Element, but it also (almost) works!
Also I think a final fantasy, where the moon drops monsters on the planet, and a zelda game.
in the last couple of years I’ve gotten back into sound (used to work live/tv sound ages back, been trying to learn more production and shit) and as a result of that I’ve gotten to know a looooooot of synth/production/effect/… related things
and christ it hurts to listen to that
I thought that the overproduction and heavy autotune was appropriate to the subject.
On topic:
“Tape machines ought to be big and cumbersome and difficult to use, if only to keep the riff-raff out.”
–Steve Albini
The obvious weird pauses (between superhuman and AI and the halfway part where suddenly nothing happens) because the AI used to made this doesn’t really understand music are also very appropriate.
gonna have to read that piece to get the context of the remark. also have a nuanced position on both the things you point to, but you’re definitely correct about the use of this in this context
sorry bro, maximum good across the quantum wave function of the universe
That is not the only bad thing, check the right side of the moons opening image, why is the moon hairy?
I think it would be better as a faux-Hillsong bop.
THE BASILISK IS MY SU-PER-HE-RO
why yes, the kid went to a C of E primary for a bit and they fucking loved that one
I haven’t read it yet (and I might not even bother) but Google’s probably lying about their ML models again
“I can predict the structure and interactions of all of life’s molecules”
it does seem mildly useful https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/screening-against-alphafold-models-maybe-better-it-looks
note that google’s thing is pattern matching, and if there’s few similar protein structures in literature, then alphafold is working on poor quality data. comments do notice a red flag or two
Can’t see the comments on there unfortunately, but interesting start to that piece. Will read it in parts today as I get time
if you’re using firefox, disable enhanced tracking protection to see disqus comments
Ah my solution to this is different: if the things that I use to protect my shit are blocking some $x, ah well that can just get fucked then
Too exhausted by all the bullshit to try debug someone’s fuckery and specialcase them. Only exception is if it’s something I need (and then I’ll do so very grumpily, and quite possibly loudly)
got you
i mean specifically this one
I don’t believe this says anything useful about Alphafold or Cryo structures because I just don’t believe these hit-rates. Anyone who reports 50% success from virtual screening has something very wrong with their assay. Before doing anything they should stick a pin in the catalogue 50 times, test those compounds, and when 25 of them come back active they should stop and work out why.
The rest of criticisms is in article
hahaha that’s an amazing comment, and yeah agreed/understood
also note that the big failures come from faulty biology, not from faulty chemistry. You can set innumerable piles of cash on fire if you choose to plug a wrong enzyme
elaborating on that. when you can hit a protein cleanly (without some side effects (called off-target, there are also on-target side effects)) but you hit wrong protein, this doesn’t have to be a complete loss, but it’s likely. maybe you learn something, either about biology of that all or about something else that it interacts with, or maybe you have found a cure to some other disease instead. but this is the actual hard problem of drug development, especially when the biology of it all is little known. there’s a few of these drugs that started this way, fentanyl, viagra, thalidomide (as anticancer), minoxidil come to mind, and at worst you have a new tool for biologists. alphafold won’t help with that
also note it’s from january so not about the new thing
The slatestar subreddit is doing its regular so what’s up with all the racists constantly crawling out of the woodwork around here surprised pikachu thread, in response to Scotty doing Hanania Week in the substack.
Amazing how much they memoryholed the Scott emails.
Scott is of the opinion that being able to maintain peaceable discourse with people who you deeply disagree with on political issues is an important feature of society which we shouldn’t readily make exceptions to.
“Scott being nice to racists and reviewing their books positively actually means he’s less racist” is a good rhetorical trick.
HBD is a legit line of scientific inquiry you guys, it’s not just eugenics obsessed weirdoes and fascists trying to bring back birthright as the primary path to privilege.
It’s also a patently idiotic philosophy boiling down to basically negotiating with terrorists.
So what exactly happens to people who get really into Scott et al. and then realize that they’re racist? I mean people like OP who genuinely seemed shocked by how buddy buddy their “unorthodox” intellectuals are with blatant racists.
Do they slowly disengage from rationalist-spheres, or do they just become cryptoracists like all the other idw types?
at least one vein of this goes off into the vibes cluster that is TPOT
They start reading sneerclub and then see that the stereotypes about hwo horrible the place is are not true. Then they post, then they are lost.
Trapped in Acausal Robot God’s maze forever
We just cut out the middleman, no fancy simulation needed, we can torture ourselves well enough.
Also what the fuck?
In your mind, is a racist who “possesses strong animus towards non-whites” a special category of person with which we should not engage in any kind of discussion? Or if we should not be casual towards them, how should we act? Why?
is this trying to say “discrimination against racists is the real racism”? … Would that be “racismism”?
“should we really treat violent racists any differently from how we would casually treat a neighbour? what is it really you expect me to do do? why are you so ridiculous?”
just some casual afternoon reframing of violent racism and dehumanising anyone that isn’t like themselves, no biggie
You can like a thinker without endorsing all of their beliefs, even if their beliefs are evil. Why do people like Schmitt and Heidegger even though they were fascists? Or Foucault given his views on the age of consent? I agree that Hanania’s views are relevant context, but I think it’s fine to write a book review that doesn’t try to analyse the author’s motivations or the book’s place in a wider political context.
Hanania is clearly analogous to Foucault and Heidegger, and also is it even wrong to completely divorce a work from all context.
I think Scott was simply more interested in writing an article on arguments aginst civil rights law than an article on whether Hanania is engaged in an insidious project to smuggle rascist ideas into the mainstream via his legal arguments, and frankly I find that kind of review more interesting too. Perphaps this is irresponsible, but at the end of the day Scott is a modestly influential blogger that just likes to write about things he finds interesting.
uwu smallbean blogger with absolutely no agenda besides the pursuit of truth and civility strikes again.
Google has supplemented their AI customer service backend with a just as stupid AI front-end. They’re pushing you to make refund claims with “Google AI”. It’s a chat bot, and you’re pushed to use it to see the status of your refunds. Clicking a button and viewing a table of refund requests is apparently too Web 2.0, so instead you can ask a chatbot to pull up that status of your refunds one…by…one. It’s the second least useful use of a chatbot I’ve ever seen personally, right behind the chatbot they put into my office’s seating software.
from bsky: “It is now officially fair game to make fun of this little shit”
Don’t forget Tiffany. Chick got a 13 carat diamond engagement ring from her fellow lucky sperm club member billionaire husband.
Nick Bostrom’s advertising his new book about what if AIs let us sleep until noon and wouldn’t that be grand.
Also call me paranoid, but “A winter wonderland glittering with possibilities for discovery and play” sounds exactly like the sort of thing an LLM might generate.
Outright millenarianism
Also there was a whole thing about how CGTP tends to use ‘delve’ a lot because it’s been RLHF’d by speakers of nigerian english, so yeah.
Bostrom yearns for retirement/unemployment the book.
someone re-invented email-threading. It’s billed as a way to have “long and complex discussions.” Their prototypical example? Yud’s utterly pointless thoughts on imaginary scenarios conjured up by his immense brain. Orange site is skeptical and yearns for 4chan instead.
The feature I am looking forward to the most in comminication apps is having a machine learning model listen to those “quick calls”, generate summary and action items and post them right back in the thread. You get the benefits of both worlds that way.
Oh, you do, do you?
Announced a year ago. AFAIK nothing like it actually exists yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DaJVZBXETE
Fractal sealions
I love the HN response that’s basically “soooo, usenet with trn, then?” Though a client that handles email reply bottom posting with “>” prefixed fragments more accurately describes this use case.
Either way there is nothing new under the sun.
Their entire manifesto could have been replaced with:
“Oh hey check out our threads in threads demo so you can comment on comments!”
Like it’s not that deep. It doesn’t need a manifesto.
This manifesto could have been an e-mail!
Hi, Im threadGPT, I am an advanced AI which will make concise bullet points out of longer email or comments, here is a bulletpointed list of the above comment.
- This manifesto could have been an e-mail!
- As a large language model, if anyone deserved to have a Tamagotchi of them tortured for all eternity …
Some rich investor/math nerd croaks (from old age), HN’s resident mod team declines to add a black bar to the site, leading fans of licking rich boots to wonder if “the community” should decide which dead rich guys get commemorated:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40327812
Bonus for the dude still salty Terry Davis didn’t get one.
Their comments section just never fails to deliver … something.
Online communities with reasonable debate are under attack by state actors, HN is no exception. In this context, no matter how well meaning the proposal is, opening an avenue for acrimony here is not something we can afford.
At least this dead hedge fund guy has a wikipedia “controversies” section as a legacy. I wonder if a genius mathematician could figure out a way to enrich his friends and family while the markets took a dump.
According to The Wall Street Journal in May 2009, Simons was questioned by investors on the dramatic performance gap of Renaissance Technologies’ portfolios. The Medallion Fund, which has been available exclusively to current and past employees and their families, surged 80% in 2008 in spite of hefty fees; the Renaissance Institutional Equities Fund (RIEF), owned by outsiders, lost money in both 2008 and 2009; RIEF declined 16% in 2008.
This sneer sponsored by me getting surgery last Friday and being extremely sore
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/bkr9BozFuh7ytiwbK/my-hour-of-memoryless-lucidity
Surgery is the perfect opportunity to test one’s “Am I in the matrix?” mental sigils and other fun rationalist mind games!
Several years ago, I was thinking about worthwhile precautions to take against strange scenarios and wanted a way to defend against erasure of my short-term memory, e.g. by the CIA or alien abductions.
Of course someone made a follow up post encouraging readers to experiment with dangerous hardcore drugs for giggles.
This is presumably the sort of thing which is tough to get past an institutional review board these days, but easy to do yourself over the weekend with a friend or two.
Little mention that this might be a terrible idea, but at least someone pointed it out in the comments
Important notice: benzodiazepines are serious business: benzo withdrawals are amongst the worst experiences a human can go through, and combinations of benzos with alcohol, barbiturates, opioids or tricyclic antidepressants are very dangerous: benzos played a role in 31% of the estimated 22,767 deaths from prescription drug overdose in the United States.
Lesswrong and drug abuse. A match made in heaven.
Several years ago, I was thinking about worthwhile precautions to take against strange scenarios and wanted a way to defend against erasure of my short-term memory, e.g. by the CIA or alien abductions.
What…
Makes you wonder if LW just attracts people with weird paranoid thoughts, or that you get more weird paranoid thoughts due to being a lot on lesswrong. Right
This is another example of how LW is a cult, if some other commenter had replied like this you’d expect the reply to be ignored but the respondent is of the same tribe, so author has no problem exposing them (and himself, by extension) as cranks to an appreciative audience (us).
Jesus, that second post.
[Benzos are] not only a great amnestic, it’s also apparently one of the most heavily prescribed drug classes historically, and used recreationally - which puts very strong lower bounds on the drug’s safety in practice, and means it’s probably readily available.
Yeah, because no widely used drug has ever turned out to be harmful, right?! Right?! Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to huff some glue. After all, glue huffing is widely practiced recreationally - by kids, even - so it’s probably safe, right?
Benzos
Apparently JBP might still be on benzos, after he tried the russian coma method (which seems to have blasted his mind further, he was already weird before, but now he just seems even dumber). So GG there LW.
it’s a known issue https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kindling_(sedative–hypnotic_withdrawal)
that’s a very carefully worded comment. there’s a reason why benzos were commonly prescribed in the past (but less so now)
Also
> “Unless you’ve used benzodiazepines before and know what dose you need, you should probably google around for dosing guidance”
Yup, kids, you should google for safe benzo usage. That’ll be safe. Yup. Super rational.
Eh, just ask ChatGPT.
it sounds like what they’re trying to do is Wada test, for no particular reason, with zero knowledge what they’re trying to do or what tools do they need for that
about everything what could they learn from that is already described in psychiatry and psychology textbooks, but it’s too hard for homeschooled first-principlers like them
Nothing illustrates the difference between rational and Rationalist than ignoring the advice of trained professionals and instead roping in a SO to help perform ad-hoc personality tests. Dude’s gonna need to work to keep that girlfriend coz it’s unlikely he’s going to find someone else willing to put up with his shit.
this is peak 18-century science
Inorite! “Here, let me replace my blood with blood from a horse, it should make me stronger”
we have mkultra at home
on the other hand, that’s just speedrunning being jordan peterson
on the third hand, our very good friend apparently never had been drunk
on the fourth hand, our very good friend also didn’t clock that maybe his ability to assess his own mental state was disturbed (it was) (severely)
on the fifth hand, this is an effect of many drugs, iv line suggests midazolam but maybe ketamine was an option. neither are exactly easily available for regular civilian (other benzos are)
first principling that benzos are completely safe, yeah way to go, 10/10. also not their first rodeo, but lwers on drugs would be megaminds on adderal, at least that’s what could be noticed previously
can’t wait to see how the felon musk stans try to excuse this one (archive)
The company said in its blog post that the problem began in late February, but it has since been able to compensate for the lost data
ah yes, because the lost data is the problem, but the thing floating in someone’s brain after coming loose 3 months ago isn’t something to speak up about. totes fine.
and there’s a certain kind of regularity to keeping the lid on that news. like it was a choice to take that action. if only there were words for something like a pattern? of behaviour? if only[0]
[0] - (with apologies to stealing the phrasing from mmfish)
I just feel bad for the guy they implanted this in. Going to join the list of people who had a short term working piece of tech implanted and now are walking around with scrap. (It isn’t that far yet for this guy, but Musk doesn’t have the best track record).
PZ Myers called this: https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2024/05/09/i-predicted-the-fate-of-neuralink/
yeah I mean not to dismiss that, it’s not the hardest of predictions. the thing i’m pointing at here is more that another felon musk company lies and misdirects, in the pattern of culture set by the fucking turd-in-chief.
https://less.online/ - they couldn’t be bothered to write the 5 lines of js to do their karma discount automatically
Seeing Cremieux Recueil will be there, does anyone know who’s behind it, what’s the deal with it, etc? I’m always seeing it pop up on these freaks’ timelines and I imagine it’s eugenics shit but I can never be bothered to dig enough to find the really incriminating stuff. It’s well creepy though.
Hosting entity appears to be at the bottom:
Ben Pace & the team at Lightcone Infrastructure.
Could start digging from there
Lightcone are the guys convinced they will save the future of humanity by writing and hosting the LessWrong/EA forum code.
I am still curious about how well that belief will hold up under a couple hundred bucks of darknet services
Aha! It turns out Cremieux is the r/slatestarcodex poster formerly known as /u/Tr–yPorn0 (slur dashed out), or TP0 for those who don’t even want the slur in dashed-out form. A really persistent race scientist with a habit of (a) misrepresenting the papers he spammed as links (b) misrepresenting himself. He used to run a tiny blog as “Cremieux” when he was claiming to be an economist from Liechtenstein. Then he got pumped by the other race scientists. So I expect this to very much be Racist Fest.
some past hits from TP0:
- https://old.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/9ypgfl/commenter_calls_hbd_junk_science_ssc_is_having/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/bje7oh/this_whole_exchange_is_gold/
- https://old.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/amna7n/we_know_nigerians_have_low_national_iq_because/
his style is gish gallops and paywalled papers that turn out not to support his claims, and citing Emil Kirkegaard’s pseudojournals a lot
Here’s another good one: https://old.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/12qbsfo/tpo_has_joined_twitter_been_tweeted_by_paul/
paywalled papers that turn out not to support his claims
My favorite tp0 moment was when someone pointed out the identical twins in an adoption study he cited were barely separated, and tp0 blocked him and left the original chart using data from the study up.
Googling the blog name brings up this delightful interview
https://www.jollyheretic.com/p/bad-science-vs-based-science-cremieux
Crémieux was kind enough to grant me a podcast, where we covered all manor of things Based, from the IQ of the Ashkenazis, why the Vikings were violent, the effect of selection events, and the need for anonymity in Based science.
Ah yes, anonymity, a cornerstone of the scientific method.
Wow amazing, thank you. What a sicko.
frequent ACX commenter, Here he is on IQ and genes Very into citing OpenPsych as solid gold scientific fact. Race scientist, yes.
Wow, I knew what I was in for but god that’s unpleasant.
There’s no clearly-articulated theory of cultural regression to the mean, but there is a genetic one, and it is consistent with the results.
Ahh, see, racism is just more intellectually convenient.
That ‘only show authors confirmed coming’ button. Wtf lol.
A phrase that gains a completely different meaning once one notices that aella is attending.
Wait what she is also attending? Wait, no of course she is, and also lol.
Surprised and a bit disappointed to see patio11 attending. Gwern isn’t though, lol.
I’m a bit surprised to see his name. I read “Seeing like a bank” and snippets of a few other blogposts, he didn’t come off as a ghoul
it’ll be interesting to see his reaction to the room full of race scientists. I wonder how well they can hide their power level.
suspicion: this is a recruitment event, and a lot of people might try to be on their best obfuscatory behaviour
preview:
reality:
“how to inflate your event by pretending there’s more to it” (tbh i wouldn’t mind if esr would inflict his pleasant personality on that crowd; and of course the renowned philosopher agnes callard will attend)
ESR hasn’t blogged for ages,no? I believe his old blog was offline for a long time because lack of TLS/backup or something.
It got a malware infection and nobody bothered fixing it. By the end its commenters were enjoying long threads entirely composed of dogwhistles.
Yeah that was exactly what I meant amazing bullshit
Wildbow: “you know the Empire 88 and the biotinkers were bad guys in Worm right”
Why is Patrick McKenzie attending this, I wonder?
“A Festival of Writers Who are Wrong on the Internet”
How is it possible to be so thoroughly immune to self-reflection.
Vampires?
Wtf? It’s like they made a sex offenders list, just nothing but libertarians and racists
Oh look, another company’s “we won’t data scrape against our users’ wishes to feed spicy autocomplete” mask has just crumbled. I am so surprised.
Let’s see how many of my comments I can delete or overwrite with garbage before they ban me.
i couldn’t delete the one question i had on stackoverflow, so i used a text generator to overwrite the body and title of the question. fight garbage with garbage
Is the AI lying? wonders the Guardian and turns to this guy:
“As the deceptive capabilities of AI systems become more advanced, the dangers they pose to society will become increasingly serious,” said Dr Peter Park, an AI existential safety researcher at MIT and author of the research.
Who of course validates the sentient AI frame. They should have asked him if this means that we are closer to Terminator or Matrix.
