Israeli soldiers appear to be using the Turkish-Palestinian Friendship Hospital in the Gaza Strip as a br for military operations, and, since March, also a school in the village of Juhor ad Dik, which is located about one kilometer from the border with Israel and was destroyed in the Israeli attack on the Gaza Strip, indicated by aerial photographs that the Washington Post published on Friday.

The report states that the satellite imagery documents the construction of earth berms around the hospital, which halted operations early in the war, in late November, and near the school in Juhor ad Dik in the second half of March.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, no. Shilling for the IDF is a bad look.

    They bombed the hospitals and are denying health care while occupying the health care facilities. So instead of “hiding behind patients” bullshit, it is denying the ability to treat patients.

    Not being exactly the same is not as important as the fact that they are running military operations from a hospital.

    • jetA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It doesn’t matter if its a bad look, it gives the apologists ammunition to undermine all of the valid and critical war crime reporting.

      The IDF is operating from a former hospital site, which is terrible - it isn’t, however, the same as using a active hospital and patients as a human shield for military operations - which is what the IDF claimed Hamas was doing.

      Going around and saying the IDF is doing what they said Hamas was doing, when there is a critical difference, will undermine all reporting of the IDF war crimes.

      fact that they are running military operations from a hospital.

      The complaint here isn’t ‘They are denying a hospital’ it’s clearly meant to trigger outrage ‘look at this MFers doing exactly what they accused Hamas of doing using human shields’ … from a hospital implies its a active hospital, not a deactivated former hospital site.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        It doesn’t matter if its a bad look, it gives the apologists ammunition to undermine all of the valid and critical war crime reporting.

        Any criticism gives apologists ammunition because they twist everything and lie. What stupid fucking reason not to call bad actors out on their bullshit.

        You are being an apologist for the IDF right now.

        • jetA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          6 months ago

          Pointing out the current “news” is working against the anti-genocide interests is not being a apologist, and you calling it such is a weak attempt at gate-keeping and a ad-hominin attack.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            You have no idea what either of those words mean.

            Keep embarrasing yourself though, it is entertaining.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        The fact that there aren’t patients seems immaterial. The rules against this aren’t predicated on how many patients are inside.

        By militarizing the hospital, they’ve made it a target, which you’re not supposed to do. That’s essential infrastructure. That’s jeopardizing that critical infrastructure by using it as a shield.

        It’s not good.