• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    This is not mildly infuriating. This should just be illegal. Paying money to close your account is beyond infuriating

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 days ago

    I left two cents in mine and just left it as is. I like to think that every time those pirates send me a letter telling me I have 2 cents left or send me checks which I don’t cash it costs them money.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is because you are not the customer. Your employer is the customer, they are the ones who get to choose the HSA provider for their employees. You are the goods to be sold. The HSA provider is simply harvesting profits.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “You are not the customer, you are the product” is true so often, but in many cases (like this one) it doesn’t really apply.

      First off, “not the customer but the product” is an inherently antagonistic relationship. Your goals are opposed to Facebook’s, for instance, because you want to spend less time on the platform and you want to interact with friends and not brands, but Facebook wants the opposite of both. But with HSA administration, your goals and your employer’s goals are aligned: you both want someone who will quickly and painlessly manage your account without being a pain.

      Second, “not the customer but the product” implies an undisclosed, extractive payment occurring behind the scenes. TikTok is harvesting a great deal of data from you and selling it to other companies. You are the product in that your data has value. But with HSA administration, the product is just the management of your HSA money; there’s no under-the-table dealing going on here (or there shouldn’t be); they’re getting paid by your company for their services.

      Third, “not the customer but the product” relationships are entirely one-way; you have no way to impact the providing company beyond just not using their services. They do not, will not, and at some level can never care about your experience beyond making it as minimally useful to you to keep you on the platform. But that HSA provider desperately needs your company’s business, so if enough of your coworkers raise a stink and get your company to complain, they will make a change.

      In actuality, “not the customer but the product” ignores the unfortunate reality of most HR/payroll service companies in this case: they’re just the lowest bidder, contracted at the bottom dollar to provide the cheapest services possible, because your employers don’t have to use their services and don’t care about your experience.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    Drain it to zero and then let them auto close it for inactivity. Or keep it open forever since there’s no admin fee.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s an HSA, keep as much as you can in it. Use it for medical if you have too. Let it become functionally an IRA when you hit 65.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Cause everything is stupid and you can’t choose your own HSA, I had multiple at one point. It’s easier to merge them all and close the rest so you aren’t keeping track of a ton of accounts.

        Edit: Also if your investing there are better or worse accounts, so moving all the money into one can help make you more money.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve had one open for years that is empty. I think they’re hoping I eventually put money in it so they can drain it for the years it sat unused.

  • Vent@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    The admin fee is $0. Can you just transfer all of the money out and keep the account empty?

    • jackal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is exactly what I do. Spend all the money out of the account and delete my login. Done this at least a couple times and I’ve never had an issue. What are they gunna do? File a bullshit claim on my credit?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honest question: why? I’ve only been able to use an HSA once, and I thought the big advantage is that it’s your money you can keep and use whenever. Can’t you just keep using it normally, ideally save some of it?

        In my case, my ex got it put in our divorce judgement that I would carry “traditional” insurance, so I knew that my HSA had no future

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          HSAs are an annoying attempt to fix US health insurance. They are tax free (meaning your money goes farther), but you can only contribute to them if you have a high deductible health insurance plan.

          Additionally, you are limited to a couple thousand a year in contributions and that money can only be used for approved health expenses. The slight upside is that the money won’t ever go away, meaning you can keep building up your HSA and even invest it.

          Where it’s gotten weird is that many people actually just use it as tax deffered savings, as after 65 (I think) the money becomes general use.

          However, this means HSAs primarily benefit wealthier people by only really being accessible to those who already have insurance and have excess money to contribute.

        • potpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You can’t contribute to the HSA but can spend it on qualified medical expenses or sit on it until age 59.5 and draw it down or use it to pay Medicare premiums starting at 65.

        • jackal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, I spent the money using the American healthcare system. Because my insurance sucks so much that I often get shafted with huge bills. One such recent one was learning I had to get hearing aids out of pocket as my plan had no coverage. That is why my HSA is gone.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s unfortunate: it definitely sucks both that hearing aids are inordinately expensive and that they’re not usually covered. I assumed from reading your post that it was more intentionally spending down and abandoning the account

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s that someone has to do work and they want things to be automated. Everything with a fee is to cover salaries.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What I mean is that if a human has to interact with you, you have to pay for that time. That, at least, would be the justification.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              As somebody who works in designing software systems, including for large companies, lets just say that the amount of human time that goes into a customer account closure is negligible because main business operations such as openning and closing customer accounts are the ones that get automated the soonest and the furthest.

              The stuff that uses “lots” (in relative terms) of manpower is supporting customers with really unusual problems involving third parties and even then spending 2.5 h man/hours (assuming the administrative person get paid $10/per hour) is pretty uncommon.

              You’ve been lied to, repeatadly, for at least 3 decades.

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I’m not saying that I accept their word, which I am apparently failing at conveying. I am a technology director myself and agree that it’s not any effort. I’m just saying that they will lie and charge you money.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Ah, right - I misunderstood that point you were making.

                  So, as it turns out, we’ve been in agreement all along.

              • Vent@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                $10/hr for customer support? Any random fast food joint will pay you more if you have a pulse. Maybe if you offshore it…

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Not living in the US, I’m not up to date with US salaries.

                  That said, even for administrative personnel paid $25/h, $25 will pay 1h of somebody’s work which is way beyond what is needed to close a retail customer account in any modern administrative system were such thing is a common operation which should take less than a minute to do, because people who design the kind of company administrative computer systems (such as yours truly, at least during part of my career) will make the most common business operations be the fastest to do in that system.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had this happen a couple jobs ago - I successfully spent it down to $1, but the they wouldn’t transfer that little. I suppose I may still legally have this amount somewhere

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You can always just transfer it yourself. Withdraw it from a physical location (assuming there is one) for that bank and deposit it in your own hsa account.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      It deceives people whose idea of how things work in large companies hasn’t changed since the days when it was the manager of your bank branch who decided if you you should get a loan or not.

      Nowadays, for certain in middle and large size companies, all the administrative main business pathways are heavilly if not totally automated and it’s customer support that ends up eating the most manpower (which is why there has been so much of a push for automated phone and chat support systems, of late using AI).

      Those $25 bucks for “account closure” pays at worst for a few minutes of somebody’s seeking the account from user information on a computer, cross checking that the user information matches and then clicking a button that says “Close accout” and then “Ok” on the confirmation box and the remaining 99% or so left after paying for that cost are pure profit.

  • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminds me of when my ISP who was “no contract” had a cancellation fee. Like I have to pay money to stop being billed? Something about that feels very backwards.

  • tburkhol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I was looking for a non-employer HSA, there’s a lot of providers out there with not-exactly-predatory terms. All kind of fees or restrictions that you wouldn’t find on other types of checking/saving/brokerage accounts. I ended up a Lively, but they added some investment/transfer fees when Schwab bought Lively’s investment partner TDA.

    I suspect it’s partly because most HSA are determined by the employer, so someone in HR can be induced to choose a fee-laden plan if it’s easier for them, and partly because the tax benefits are so great that it still makes sense even after paying a $20 junk fee here and there.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    HSAs are a misdirect to get you to ignore how shitty high deductible plans are. Never take the high deductible plan.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It really depends. My company, you always do the high deductible. The OOP Max is only $5k compared to $13k for the other. The difference in premiums plus my employers contribution to the HSA are more than the difference between the two deductibles. The plans cover the same stuff. I don’t really get why they’re set up how they are.

      • londos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        My company offers something similar, but I worry it’s a short term incentive to get more people onto HDPs and then quietly make that the only option.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It depends though. If you are relatively healthy with no chronic issues (yet) and have enough saved for an emergency, it can save you a good amount of tax-free money that you can use for when you get older and sicker. That and the monthly premium is much lower than a PPO. Obviously universal healthcare is still the best option.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        My company has high deductible plan with $1800 deductible and another with $3600 deductible. I just divide those by 12 and add to monthly premium when comparing against HMO/PPO plans.

        I’m single and old.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is your company paying part of the deductible? I can’t get an HSA-qualifying plan with deductible under $6000. Also single and old.

          • bitchkat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Generally the lower the deductible, someone is paying more upfront. How that is split between employer and employee is unknown to me. My last two jobs have had similar high deductible plans.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      HSAs are also a way to get healthy people away from wanting universal health care by catering to their self interest, just like how IRAs were intended to let people with money invest in retirement which eroded support for social security.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I save money with the HSA/high deductible. I always plan around using 100% of deductible. Premium plus HSA contribution is less than the PPO option.

      I’ll never pick an 80/20 plan. They generally charge more and cover less.

      And I’m an old hag and have recently got cataract surgery in both eyes, hearing aids, etc.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fact that you get charged for a paper statement and that is not an opt in is more infuriating.