Nature is healing

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    EA lost $6 billion in market value

    And yet, nothing of value was lost. What a paradox!

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dragon Age Veilguard was a bastardization of Dragon Age. Of course it was going to fail. You failed your core audience, you idiots.

    If you wanted to make a Marvel version of a dark fantasy game, you could’ve made a new IP, instead of leeching off the brand.

  • Merlin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    EA stopped innovating years ago and became a games monetization shop. You reap what you sow.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Afee losing some sports licenses or the Star Wars license… EA doesn’t really have much going for it anymore.

    I guess we’ll see if DICE can salvage Battlefield up next.

    Idk how the decade+ of Need for Speed games that range from mediocre to outright awful are selling anymore either.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Baldurs gate 3 ruined it for the large AAA developers/publishers. People are now excepting good games like that.

    Look. I don’t care about the political content in a game as long as the game is good!

    The issue is, these large game companies have been trying to change the mindset of gamers to accept games with less content because at the end of the day the only thing these companies want is to sell horse armour.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Normally these articles are slightly alarmist making it sound like a company will fall over becuase of one bad game release and when you look at the share price over time it is still up. but this one is interesting. EA are down 15% over the past 12 months because of this one drop.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Another way to see that 15% drop is hinted at in the article:

      EA FC generates around $2 billion annually, Reuters reports, with around $800 million of that made up by Ultimate Team.

      Loot boxes made EA $800M last year. It’s easy to see why EA and other publishers demand MTX in games. Can we amend “Don’t preorder” with “and ignore micro transactions”?

      • projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        @chicosuave@lemmy.world Pretty sure that ignoring micro-transactions has always been “a thing” to take a stand against. But of course, when it comes to the general public, no one ever does.

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah most game news websites don’t understand stocks but in this case, DA Vanguard was a massive failure. In the press release, the game was played by 1.5 million people. Not copies sold, just played. This probably includes people that just bought a month of EA Play to check it out.

      The newest fifa game (EA sports FC now) also under-performed but they didn’t say much about it beyond that. A few more flops and it sounds like EA could be following Ubisoft into crashing hard.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 days ago

        Schreier’s added context to this is that FC is far more responsible for the financial underperformance than Dragon Age.

        • CMLVI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          They won’t say that though, because they have a built in narrative of “we were too woke”; convenient excuse for a less micro transaction heavy game to be blamed, as well as an excuse to be more strict on themes in their games. None of the problems are solved, but they have a scapegoat.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            I don’t think this is a narrative EA is leaning into. Frankly, even if it sold less than they forecast, I’m sure they were happy they sold as much as they did given the troubled production it was converted from.

            • CMLVI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I don’t particularly think it is either, just that’s it’s conveniently there. The prevailing narrative about failed games recently has been wokeism, and not just the simple fact that games are increasingly shitty as the point isn’t a compelling narrative or gameplay, but how many micro transactions can be squeezed out of a franchise.

                • CMLVI@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I don’t think so, but it is “woke”, and that’s a good enough reason for many to stick their fingers in their ears and claim that’s why it didn’t sell well.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 days ago

        EA could be following Ubisoft into crashing hard.

        I wouldn’t miss them. I’m still mad at EA about what they did with Westwood. And they haven’t stopped being shit.

  • lumpybag@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 days ago

    They’ve been running the same money sucking schemes for the last decade. The gravy train is over