Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    As someone who was in a supportive relationship with a transgender person for 3 years and who personally struggles associating with my own gender (masculinity was never my thing lol), I never really got into the stating my gender pronouns.

    I get why it’s done for the times it matters and can do so in a sensitive space, but I get the sense it’s usually done as public compliance (like a cis neolib as an email sig), which can lead to shallow support or worse, resentment. What we ultimately need is more genuine contact with people different from ourselves because that helps reduce “othering” a group.

    Oh, but I do tend to default to “they” out of old internet habits. Always disliked the assumption all gamers are men.

    • jsomae@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It makes me uncomfortable to state my personal pronouns. Years of growing up as a woman on the internet makes me not want to reveal my gender, even when it’s obvious (like in person).

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      because that helps reduce “othering” a group

      Which is, ironically, what the pronoun-stating thing was supposed to avoid. Personally I agree that it’s not really necessary, and that it actually is a form of compelled speech.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t do it either, but i’m an older queer so i see it as painting a target on my back.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Ima be honest. I just don’t fuck with pronouns. I’ll typically use they even if I know what their preferred ones are. That or whatever feels better for what I’m talking about.

      • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You are describing intentional misgendering. That’s against our instance rules, so make sure you use preferred pronouns for folks who display them.

        • belluck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Can using neutral pronouns be misgendering? I was always under the impression that they’re universally applicable regardless of the other person’s gender

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              It’s arguably ignoring their preferences, but how is it misgendering? they/them is gender neutral-- it implies nothing about their gender at all.

          • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Consider the scenario where you meet a man. You know his name is Bradley (either through mutual friends or whatever), but he introduces himself as Alex. You can call him Bradley, and it would be technically correct, but it would be slightly rude when he has explicitly given his preferred name as Alex.

            • jsomae@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              I don’t think that’s quite right. It’s more like referring to him by another title such as “a friend of mine” or “a guy I met at the mall yesterday” etc.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That’s a false equivalence. A name is a unique identifier while pronouns serve only a mechanical linguistic purpose.

        • iSeth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I would argue calling all they/them is the opposite of misgendering. “They” has no gender. It is neuter.

          “Intentional non-gendering” seems sensible and inoffensive. No chance of misgendering anyone.

          • jsomae@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I have met one person (in real life) who uses she/he pronouns. I asked if I can call her they and she said no. I don’t know what to make of this, personally, as I’m unable to understand it, but I do try to abide by her request. I suspect she is an outlier though.

          • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’m a gender abolitionist philosophically, so I get what you are saying and I would also prefer for everyone to agree to adopt using gender neutral language and be done with it. But we should still respect the preferred pronouns of others, because it isn’t up to you or me to force that choice on everyone else. It’s not much different from a Republican (for example) refusing to use she/her towards a trans woman. For some folks their pronouns are super important to them, so imo it’s just disrespectful not to use them when they are stated.