https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/sag@lemm.ee
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/sag@lemm.ee
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
If LW has a tos they have to be consistent and follow it as a normal business practice for it to protect them when something goes wrong.
You waved a red flag and said I’m violating the TOS, what are you going to do about it? You volunteered this information, nobody asked you to do it.
You backed LW into a corner, and they had to apply their TOS or in a future court case they couldn’t rely on it to protect them. I.e. the prosecutor would say that LW didn’t enforce it’s TOS, here are reports of TOS violations being ignored, etc…
In many communities children’s data is treated differently, and their is a higher moderation and safety requirement for the service provider. You often see this in online services saying you have to be at least 13/16/18 to use this service, it’s because they don’t want to have to follow the special rules for children.
Wow, this comment got 7 downvotes from 2 year old accounts with no posts or comments and 4 digits in the name… That is quite the coincidence.
@lwadmin@lemmy.world I suspect the LW accounts above share the same ip address, you might want to look into your logs for astroturfing.
Interesting
More fun tidbits 4 of those accounts were created on the same day - Cake Day 2023-08-05
Please help me understand, my above post was written earnestly. I was explaining to a user why they got a outcome they didn’t like in the community to adjudicate moderator outcomes. I presented reasoning for my rational in the comment.
How can I explain my interpretation more helpfully?