• Mixairian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just going to steal the response I read years ago.

    “I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man. I use it to look at pictures of cats and get into arguments with strangers.”

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve started l to realize that actual information worth reading is not available. Like I cant access in depth medical course or text book in engineering. Lots of beginner tutorials marketed as 7 minute abs.

      Information is valuable and nobody gives it away for free. We have access to a worlds worth of crappy, unvetted trash information. But the vast majority of the good stuff is still locked away as it always was.

      • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does MIT not have open courses anymore? Besides that I wonder what you are looking for? I can find free scientific papers to improve my hobbies, watch along as professionals explain and do their jobs, graduate level math and computer science videos from the comfort of my home. As a student around 2000 (Google existed, barely) it was not so easy, even with access to university library you still had to find what you were looking for with worse tools and there was less of it. And who on earth was going to take the time to show you exactly how it worked their lab a thousand miles away? Once a week you could go to a seminar and a visiting scientist gives a slideshow. It’s better now.

        • thegreatgarbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As an oncology researcher, to do my job I have to pay approximately $30-60 per article for about half the articles in my 1500 article library for my CAR cell therapy research.

          The scientific field is slowly improving over the last 10 years, but it still sucks, and I can only read the abstract for free, which doesn’t provide enough details for my layperson research on topics like behavior or autophagy.

          I’m one of the lucky few that has an institutional subscription, and most companies don’t pay for institutional subscriptions. Also, I can’t, as someone suggested, hack into the University wifi which is a half hour away and still do my job onsite.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Opencourseware is great. But what they’re a rarity instead of the norm. I think Stanford posted lectures for a bit too. Good sources of information exist. Just like there is research we all can access but there’s not as much as it appears without having to resort to piracy.

          It became clearer to me when writing and researching topics. I still had to go to the university library and pour through books. Because that quality of information in their library is not there online. The internet didn’t replicate that knowledge. It gave us a surface level blog about topics. Don’t get me wrong. I know there’s lots of blogs and people giving in depth research for free on their speciality. But its still not a good source of knowledge like exists in academic libraries.

    • gk99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the 50s, I think it’d be pretty easy to draw a line from casual racism to white supremacists. A key difference this time is that it’s not just Germans led by one insane man, it’s instead a bunch of redneck prices and conspiracy theorists.

      • GeoGio7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Before the US got involved in WWII, there was a giant Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden…

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I presume you’re not talking about Russia? You’re going to have a hard time showing them those Nazis.

      A person from 1950s will just be super confused when you say it because they’re going to ask you what country is Nazi. If you say the US they’ll just be confused further.

      • Fatebound@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Who are these nazis”

        “Anyone that doesn’t have the same political beliefs as me!”

        “…I see”

        • mindbleach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This denial is worse than any vulgar insult.

          We’re talking about violent bigots. People responsible for mob violence against democracy, and state violence against women and minorities. Stop fucking pretending we ‘just don’t like it’ when you try to make us less than human.

  • struds@sopuli.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Things they considered morally fine (smoking, dropping litter, 40 year olds dating 16 year olds) is morally reprehensible, while things they thought were morally wrong or even outlawed are totally acceptable (homosexually, porn, divorce).

  • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We walk around with a little rectangle in our pocket that gives us access to the sum total of human knowledge, but we mostly use it for looking at funny captioned pictures, the same pictures over and over just with different captions.

    It’s called a phone but no one ever uses it as one.

    • irinotecan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, the “video telephone” that everyone always so desperately awaited from the future? Yeah, we have that; no, nobody uses it, because we can’t be bothered to dress up for a phone call.

      • PassingDuchy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also thought no one used facetime until I worked retail recently… The amount of people I saw come in on a facetime calls where they both just had their cameras pointed at the ceiling was bizarre and boggling.

  • Antimutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That smoking is bad for them. You’d just be banging your head against their socially-acceptable-at-the-time drug addiction.

    • 108beads@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grew up in the 50s and 60s. Had a pediatrician who chain-smoked, and had ashtrays all over her office literally overflowing with butts.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is every comment just about the US? Skin color, school shooter drills, actor president, support for Russians by US politicians…

    Lemmy try something more international:

    France and Germany have founded the European Union.

    First Japan, and now China (and Taiwan) and Korea are the technological superpowers.

    Car industry in the UK basically doesn’t exist anymore.

    Cuba is still communist af and yet looks like a chill place.

    Czechoslovakia has split. (Funny how even 30 years after the fact some people don’t believe it, so I can imagine it being inconceivable before.)

    There are 8 billon people.

    We still don’t have nuclear-powered flying cars.

  • AlataOrange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to go on a different angle on this one and say that we are much tougher on sexual harassment. I feel like a lot of people from the 1950s who have grown up on pulp sci-fi like Flash Gordon could accept a lot of modern technology and the internet as basically just magic. To be fair is how a lot of modern people also accept it. But I don’t think they would be able to process the move towards egalitarianism that we have taken.

    That is not to say that modern society is egalitarian only that we have made good strides in achieving that aim.

    Edit: Turns out Gordon is from the '70s, but other pulp sci-fi exist so my statement stands.