esp if you’re one of the devout ones who think they’ve been really good

    • akakunai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t really have anything to add, but thanks for writing this. It’s quite insightful.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Careful that’s how you end up drinking the blue Kool aid.

    The ending of life is a sad thing, it can be frightening to imagine losing that control.

    Faith is one form of trying to capture that control. Please try to cherish the life you have here and make the most of it. For most I suspect there’s no need to rush it.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Faith is also trying to cherish the life you have, and make the best of it. For example “God gave you a talent, don’t waste it” or saying grace and focusing on what you’re thankful for in life. I even knew people who use prayer as a form of mindfulness meditation to keep them grounded in the present.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, you end up drinking the Kool aid at gunpoint after turning your life over to a narcissistic cult leader.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    It was actually her obsession with the afterlife and the coming of the end times that led to me cutting off contact with my mother in 2014 and me renouncing my faith.

    My mom was a devout Christian my whole life, but she went full-on fire-and-brimstone Bible thumper during her divorce from my dad. My dad had cheated on her multiple times and she’d finally had enough of it.

    She hated my dad for walking out, but vehemently denied that fact and instead projected her hatred onto God himself. She would always say my dad (and anyone who supported him on his side of the family) would be judged harshly for his actions in the next life. By the way, she said this about basically anyone she didn’t like, including people she disagreed with politically or morally; it might not surprise you to learn that she was quite a bigot as well.

    In the last few years I knew her, she started to obsess over the prophecies in Revelations. She’d constantly send me chain emails about how the various conflicts in the middle east were a sign that Jesus Christ was about to return, or a misquoted article about the US government looking into identity microchips was Obama (the Antichrist, obviously) giving his followers the Mark of the Beast. The last time I spoke to her was in 2014 so I never got to ask her what she thought of Trump and his MAGA hats, but I have a strong feeling the irony would have been lost on her; I once had to explain to her that an article she showed me from The Onion was satire and her response was, “they shouldn’t be allowed to say those things.”

    She died in 2020, but not from COVID. Two years earlier, she had let a kidney stone get infected which then progressed to full-on sepsis. It responded to the treatment at the time but the infection damaged her heart, which ended up killing her. For the life of me, I couldn’t imagine why she didn’t see a doctor because a kidney stone would have hurt like hell, but then I realized she probably felt that it was just God calling her home.

    So yes, anecdotally speaking there are religious people out there who are obsessed with the afterlife. I think people are still inherently afraid of death, though, so they’re not exactly in a hurry to die. But for a religious person who’s ready to die, it’s likely nearly all they can think about.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is a comfort in knowing that we shouldn’t feel like we have to take revenge on those who wronged us because God will judge them

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or, you could spend your whole life dreaming of the day that God judges your enemies for you, instead of listening to your loved ones telling you to move on and find your own happiness, or you know, learning some actual conflict management skills.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can move on knowing it’s in God’s hands and not your burden to bear.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So this turned into a bit of a rant and while it’s likely nobody cares I’ll post it anyway.

    I don’t know about Christianity but at least in Islam this isn’t how it works. So there’s a hadith that says that death is the worst of what comes before it and the easiest of what comes after it, because the day of judgement is just that bad. There’s another that says that in the day of judgement it will be so hard that people will want Allah to start it even if they go to hell. No matter how much you think you’ve been a good person it’s not at all something to look forward to. And that’s not counting how even as a Muslim depending on what you did in your life, you could go to hell, spend a certain time there according to your sins in life and then go to heaven. Again not something most people want to find out, especially because Islam teaches that with the exception of prophets everyone sins and that we all need Allah’s forgiveness and mercy to go to heaven. The kind of arrogance it’d take to actually hope for death because you’re confident you’re going to heaven can in fact be the reason you go to hell. A devout Muslim will never think “oh I’ve been really good in life I can’t wait to die and go to heaven”.

    Then we get into how in the day of judgement people will have mountains of good deeds and mountains of bad deeds and people’s (temporary; again all Muslims will eventually go to heaven) fate will be decided over a single good or bad deed. Most people thinking seriously about the afterlife will want to live as long as possible to do good deeds and beg god for forgiveness for their bad deeds. Again, no sane Muslim will think “yep, I’m doing alright, death please”.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      I grew up in the largest muslim country, and I never knew that. I’m a devout atheist, but this is helpful to frame the thoughts others have.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s the reason the prohibition against suicide was introduced by the Catholic Church: people were killing themselves to go to Paradise. Why wait?

    • iquanyin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      buddhism has that too. if people were offing themselves in hopes of somehow reaching enlightenment thru killing, i’ve never heard of it. lol. the buddhist reasoning is that killing in general is bad but killing oneself is the worst of all because the one being that can choose to become enlightened (or at least try) and that you have control over is yourself. “so get crackin’” being the idea there.

      • Shou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        My cult taught my 13 yo self that were I to take my own life, I would have to re-experience the life that led me to suicide in order for my soul to learn the lesson. But since I robbed another soul of the oppertunity to live as me, I’d have added bad karma and would reincarnate in (a non specified country in) africa. No more help was offered.

        I’ve beaten depression, but suffered losses in cognition due to its severity and length.

    • mac@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Didn’t the Bible state that suicide is grounds for not getting into heaven?

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        The bible considers it a sin, but sin doesn’t keep you out of heaven if you’re Christian, you basically just have to try and do better.

        The Catholic church decided it was a mortal sin, and because you didn’t have time to go to confession afterwards, you would go to hell.

        That’s a drastic oversimplification, but it is kind of the root of it.

        • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Suicide is only a sin, so it would theoretically be forgiven. Problem is you must atone for your sins before death, and there no way to atone if your dead by your own hand.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I am aware of no such passage. Heaven didn’t occur to the people in that area until very late in the Bible writings. It is highly likely an introduction from the Greeks.

        • mac@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They definitely considered it a sin though? Even if not grounds for not getting into heaven due to it not existing to their knowledge.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh the theist consider it a sin but I am not aware of it being explicitly laid out as one in the Bible, could be wrong I admit.

            It makes sense when you think about it. You can’t have your slaves offing themselves.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am an atheist and have always been one, so feel free to reject what I say here, but I think I understand why they aren’t, and let me illustrate with a story from my own life:

    When I was 26, I moved from the Indiana town where I had spent my whole life to Los Angeles for work. I left my parents, my friends, even my wife for six months because she was finishing grad school. I knew I would see them all again eventually, but I still didn’t want to leave them and if there were a way I could have delayed it for years but still have been able to have a dream job in L.A., I probably would have. The first night when I got to L.A., I cried and cried because of everything I had left behind even though I was looking forward to a bright new future.

    So it’s not that they don’t want to go to the afterlife, it’s that they want to experience this life as long as possible. They want to be with all of their friends and family now, not wait for them all to die so they can be reunited in heaven.

    I don’t know, it makes sense to me.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you’ve misunderstood the awesomeness of heaven. You wouldn’t miss anyone. Infinite happiness.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The more deeply you think about heaven the more hellish it sounds. Basically you get stuck in this drugged-out bliss perpetually in worship of god. Because you’re stripped of all your corporeal problems and desires. You’re not going to hang out with friends (who would they be? Do they get a say what life stage they appear as?) None of your corporeal hobbies are there. Maybe your spouse decides they want to hang out with their previous partner who died in a car crash? You don’t learn. You don’t grow. You don’t get new experiences. You have nothing to look forward to. You’re a slave to stasis.

        The only answer to solving these problems is to place the person in a bubble. But that creates a whole new set of problems. Heaven sounds pretty shitty.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, but without the carrot, people would fight against the stick. Every religion has both the things you shouldn’t do and the reward for not doing them.

          As far as I know at least.

  • IMongoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes. I’ve seen a religious person on their death bed saying that they have lived long enough and are ready for god to take them.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    No matter how good the afterlife is, it’s not going anywhere. Life, however, is unique and finite and so should be savored.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    We see this in some cultures. Classic folks songs from the antebellum United States (e.g. Swing Low, Sweet Chariot or Wayfaring Stranger ) welcome death with the promise of salvation or afterlife. And there are plenty of worship songs and hymns that praise the afterlife and the end of the world, as if these are good things to look forward to.

    Part of this is because of the hierarchical system of middle ages feudalism. Death was always near anyway. Winter always had a body count. Child mortality was terrible (and it was always a happy thing when someone made majority at ~15, even if they were an idiot, antisocial or a bastard.) A bad run of harsh winters and poor crop yields — even a couple of sucky years — could spell famine for the entire region. There was always a labor shortage. Life for common folk was brief anyway, so there was seldom a need to hurry their way to heaven.

    As for suicides, yes, there are proscriptions against needless suicide, but this doesn’t stop countless miserables from taking on a heroic task, that is, one in which they can die easily. Revolutionaries and suicide bombers emerge from this ilk. From the Troubles and the War on Terror, we learned that our terrorists were radicalized by circumstances in their life, and imams and priests would just point them in the direction where they could get arms or bombs and a target. When you have nothing to live for, it gets easy to look to divine wind opportunities, and consider ways to make a horrific mess, and news that bleeds.

    In modern Christianity in the US, ministries look to fuel doubt in one’s own salvation. Jesus saves, but only if you’re in his in group, and He doesn’t select everyone (according to many preachers). I’ve noted this defeats the purpose, since the narrative is everyone sins, but only Jesus can forgive and making it sound like its a rare lottery ticket makes God sound more like an eldritch horror than a loving personal deity. During the protestant reformation, this was one of the reasons for the traditions Sola Fides (salvation by faith alone) and Sola Scriptura (guidance by scripture alone), so the individual parishioner doesn’t need a minister to guide them, but their salvation depends solely on their own relationship with God and scripture. In that regard, it’s possible to assume God is just and merciful and provides salvation for everyone. After all, God allegedly knows the circumstances of your life, and put you there.

    But then it’s also common to imagine that we personally, and our local kin, are going to heaven and everyone we don’t like (e.g. Hitler) is burning in Hell for eternity, though that is just a failure of empathy, of recognizing that even the worst of us do not choose cruelty, suspicion and deception, rather were shaped to do so by the elements and society around us.

    The good news is even the pope admits Only God knows the nature of the afterlife, how people are sorted. So we can assume He is reasonable and takes into account our circumstances, or He is an arbitrary monster, in which case our best behavior doesn’t matter. The natural world informs the latter, so we’re safer with the likelihood of oblivion ( All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain ) than an afterlife in which we are once again slaves to a parasitic system.

    And speaking of us naturalists, how we define our lives and identity informs how we see mortality. An afterlife has an intersection with the transporter paradox (when Captain Kirk beams down, is it Kirk or Memorex? – that should date me.) In reality, while we don’t have breaks in consciousness by space, we have breaks in consciousness by time, hence the robots in Freefall are nervous about updates and reboots, and we may not be the same person when we wake up from a good night’s sleep (rather another iteration of ourselves, with all our bits and memories and thoughts.) End-of-life studies show that a lot of people on their death bed have more frequent, more prolonged periods of unconsciousness until one day they don’t wake up. So if we don’t exist after death, we may not exist under general anesthetic or during non-REM sleep.

    (When you live, your thoughts, feelings, memories, sensations are all driven by your brain and nervous system. So when you die, if an afterlife continues your existence, it’s done by another medium, maybe a spirit-brain or magic brain or something that allows you to continue to think, perceive and exist. Otherwise, your soul could be in the center of the sun at 15 million Kelvins, and not even notice. So, assuming that Heaven and Hell exist, your physical brain won’t experience it, but some other version of you will, much like the simulation of you in Roko’s Basilisk.)

    Others define our identities by any iteration of ourselves, which allows us to wake up and be the same person who went to bed. This can get interesting now that Deep South, a computer that can run computations nearly equivalent to a human brain, has been developed as proof-of-concept. Surely, our billionaires are wondering now to create a simulation of themselves, run by a Deep South system, and give it power of attorney over their estate upon the conclusion of their human life.

    But that brings us to phase two of the transporter paradox, when a mishap creates a second Riker. The technician is saying hold on for a minute, we’ll get that dematerialized in a moment, but Riker-who-didn’t-leave is literally begging for his life. Who is the true Riker, and why isn’t it the other one?

    And before you answer that question, Holodeck simulation Riker wants to raise a critical point about civil rights.

    I’ve been reading Heaven’s River, the third fourth part of the Bobiverse series (which teems with replications of computer-simulation Bob, id est Robert Johansson) which discusses questions regarding replication drift (all the Bobs personalities diverge upon activation), and it does raise a specific illusion: Even as we live and age, we change and deviate from who we are at any previous given moment. Some of this is due to experience, other is due to age and development. So even if we could attain medical immortality, or run as a computer simulation on a robust machine with a perpetual service contract, we’d still drift away from our identity as defined in any given instant of time.

    (Incidentally, the same thing can be said about any given religion and any given culture. They change continuously, and all efforts to preserve a given identity will prove futile as time pushes up mountains and the oceans erode them away again.)

    So yeah. Memento Mori. Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.

    Edit: Draft pass

    • iquanyin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      this is why buddhism says there is no “self” in an eternal sense. in every moment, we are different than the last. vajrayana even has exercises you can do where yu mentally try to locate the “self.” is it in your forehead? your throat? your arms? and so on (actually doing it was amazing, to me). there is no self to cling to, no self to defend. all things arise from beginningless beginning due to the circumstances for it arising, and they end when the circumstances for them to remain end. (im not as good at explaining philosophies as you are, but did feel to add this.)

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is like saying that Atheists shouldn’t fear death because they know it will just be blank nothingness that they won’t perceive.

    Fear of death doesn’t come from the logical part of our brains.

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      ???

      Totally not the same. Religious people believe the afterlife is better than real life and the OP was curious why they aren’t speed running to get to it.

      A blank nothingness is not an upgrade for most people.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        It is the same because a blank nothingness isn’t bad so atheists have no reason to fear death.

        • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          A blank nothingness might not technically be bad but there are plenty of ways that transitioning to that nothingness could be absolutely terrible. There are also many people living very enjoyable lives that want to keep the party going so to speak.

          I for one am an atheist and madly in love with my wife. You bet your ass I’m gonna try and squeeze every last drop of goodness out of my life.

            • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Never insinuated that it couldn’t be applied to theists. Not sure why you’re seemingly hostile about this.

              • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Given that the whole context of this thread is why theists are scared of dying, you kind of did insinuate that with your story.

        • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s relatively worse. If you have nothing you won’t be around to complain about it. But having a good life is totally better than simply not existing.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s not relatively worse, it’s just objectively neutral. It cannot be relatively worse because it is not perceived or felt to be compared. It is just objectively neutral.

              • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                It is not zero or null, those are both conditions you perceive, it is the complete lack of perception and being. You cannot have lost anything if you no longer exist to perceive any loss.

                • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yeah that’s what null means dawg

                  Look up that photo of zero vs null in the context of toilet paper

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a stupid take. Of course they should fear death. It means the loss of everything they loved, even though they won’t experience said loss.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is. Also, if you want to mourn or fear that loss, you have to do it beforehand. Thus making the reaction to fear death completely rational for atheists.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    In roman-catholicism suicide is a bad thing that makes god angry. In the past, clerics said you would go to hell if you were to commit suicide. We also have the commandment that says “thou shall not kill”, which is shared with a lot of other religions. So, we are educated to not facilitate death, and I guess the idea is to die peacefully when death comes, thinking about the afterlife. Don’t think “exciting” is the goal here.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also most of the early Christian sects who believed either this or “no marriage/children until the second coming” died out. Either literally or they got absorbed into Catholicism as various orders.

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Speaking about Christianity – but it’s not an unforgivable sin. If one believes in what is common in Christian sects and is having a difficult lonely life without support, it definitely makes sense to commit suicide. God being angry, but then forgiving you and allowing you to live in heaven sounds better than a life of despair to me.

      It’s my opinion that most people that call themselves religious don’t actually believe. The true believers are the ones doing suicide bombings and fighting unwinnable wars.

  • Temperche@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The good afterlife is only available to them if they have been “good people” while alive, and dying early is not being a “good person”. Also, after their death, they supposedly get “judged”, and everybody is going to worry about the X number of “sins” that they did during their life that might end them up in hell.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not true even for all of Christianity, let alone all religions…

      For example orthodox Christians believe everyone goes to heaven, and that we are all bathed in unconditional love from God. Hell is finding yourself unworthy of that love because of how you lived.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Orthodox Christians believe that everyone has sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God, that the punishment for sin is death, Jesus is the only way to The Father and the way or forgiveness of sins. It’s not everyone. If everyone went to heaven that would mean sin would go unpunished.

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Punishment is a part of catholic dogma, and makes no sense if you think of God as absolutely good and loving.

          If we have allowed our hearts to be purified, then God’s presence will be healing, joyful, and life-giving. If we refuse God’s healing embrace, then His love will burn like fire, “for our God is a consuming fire” (Deut 4:24, 9:3, Isa 33:14, Heb 12:23)

          https://www.orthodoxroad.com/heaven-hell/

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Everyone is sinful and deserves hell. Forgiveness is through Jesus.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You don’t see any cognitive dissonance with that statement coming from an absolutely good and loving being?

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Absolutely good and Absolutely just.

          Not absolutely loving. Source: Bible

          “I loved Jacob, but Esau I hated.” Malachi 1

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Here’s an alternative translation of those verses from NLT:

            I loved your ancestor Jacob, but I rejected his brother, Esau

            But I don’t know any Hebrew and only a few words of ancient Greek, so can’t comment on how accurate it is.

            Besides that, the perception of God is vastly different between the testaments:

            7 Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. 8 Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. 9

            1 John 4

            You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your heavenly Father, for he makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust.

            Matthew 5:43-45

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Jesus’ verses to us about life being a gift resonate here. The duties we have aside that may shift the balance, it’s too unique an experience to say Heaven surpasses it in gift status. I wish I enjoyed mine more though, I’m more indifferent to it.

  • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I had to sleep on this before coming up with a reply. As an individual who is not what you would call religiously devout, you can take it with a grain of salt. But whatever the case, here goes…

    I grew up without religion for the most part but married a Catholic, and as musicians, we wound up playing at the local church.

    As it stands, I would not say that I have bought into the whole religious faith thing at the deepest levels. That does not come easily for me. But I think it is fair to say that certain aspects of the religious experience have rubbed off?

    In particular, I am more invested in the welfare of others ranging from my immediate family and friends (many of whom I met indirectly through church connections) to the community at large. As such, I am in no hurry to shuffle off at this point, as I feel there are people who depend on me and so I guess I still have unfinished business?

    I don’t know what happens in any afterlife. Does anyone, really? Frankly, if we all just fade away into oblivion, I’d be satisfied to simply have a peaceful release from worldy concerns, but I don’t have any expectations beyond that.

  • Axle182@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    When I was in primary school with mandatory religious education this is how I saw it