Florencia (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day ago90s rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1978arrow-down17
arrow-up1971arrow-down1image90s rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneFlorencia (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareHikermick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81arrow-down1·22 hours agoHow about the notion that one can afford to live in NYC while working at a coffee shop with only one roommate
minus-squareJaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·17 hours agoThat’s not an absurdity, and if it looks like one then it’s the world that’s wrong.
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up69·22 hours agoThe apartment was rent controlled, and legally leased by Monica’s dead grandmother. Monica was committing fraud.
minus-squareAggravationstation@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·15 hours agoBut Joey and Chandler could afford to live across the hall from them which was never explained.
minus-squarealekwithak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·edit-214 hours agosigh Chandler had a good job, working in data science, which was still mysterious and paid well in the 90s. And Joey likely got unemployment between acting jobs.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-214 hours agoIf they lived across the hall then why is breakfast together implausible? 😭 What is happening??
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoBecause most people are barely getting dressed and out the door in time.
minus-squareSouthEndSunset@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoCause most people couldn’t be arsed to do that, I suppose?
minus-squareAggravationstation@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours ago Chandler had a good job, working in data science I thought it was data entry? Which might still have been well paid in the 90s, not sure.
minus-squarealekwithak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agostatistical analysis and data reconfiguration. Sounds like data science to me. I could be wrong.
minus-squareBedSharkPal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·18 hours agoHey - I don’t like the tone I used to read that comment young man. Fuck them landlords.
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·18 hours agoFuck it. I’m getting radicalized. It should only be legal to own one property at a time!
How about the notion that one can afford to live in NYC while working at a coffee shop with only one roommate
That’s not an absurdity, and if it looks like one then it’s the world that’s wrong.
That’s part of the point.
The apartment was rent controlled, and legally leased by Monica’s dead grandmother. Monica was committing fraud.
But Joey and Chandler could afford to live across the hall from them which was never explained.
sigh
Chandler had a good job, working in data science, which was still mysterious and paid well in the 90s. And Joey likely got unemployment between acting jobs.
If they lived across the hall then why is breakfast together implausible? 😭 What is happening??
Because most people are barely getting dressed and out the door in time.
Cause most people couldn’t be arsed to do that, I suppose?
I thought it was data entry? Which might still have been well paid in the 90s, not sure.
statistical analysis and data reconfiguration. Sounds like data science to me. I could be wrong.
Fair point
Admirable hustle
Hey - I don’t like the tone I used to read that comment young man. Fuck them landlords.
Fuck it. I’m getting radicalized. It should only be legal to own one property at a time!