More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

  • Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Hey look if you start taking away white male privilege they freak out when they find out people of other races, genders and creeds are better than them, who knew?

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When I think of all the women & girls in my life that I care about, I remember that I could never be a conservative. It would be a betrayal.

    Assuming this is accurate, I’m pleased to see men in the UK bucking the trend.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This is out of date.

      People are losing faith rapidly in the left because they don’t seem to be for the everyday working class Briton like they used to be.

      There is a big shift going to Reform now largely because they want to reduce immigration. The left deny the situation and the right have claimed they will reduce it every year then increase.

      People are flooding to the “far right”* because they don’t seen the main parties address the main issue they want addressing and have been talking about for decades at this point, generations even.

      _* not actually far right. But the left love throwing that term around to anyone that has a different opinion to them. They just want lower immigration, which historically has been a left leaning ideology

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As women gain independence, frightened men turn to patriarchal solutions. Hence a turd like JD Vance spouting hateful and controlling rhetoric on podcasts and Ahole Tate brainwashing adolescent boys. Fuck these people.

  • puntyyoke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    A few folks have mentioned that these charts

    1. conflate liberal/conservative with the dominant left/right parties in these nations
    2. does not include people who do not identify with one of those dominant parties
    3. have some somewhat unreliable stats magic behind them

    A lot of young men in the US are reporting themselves as “not a Democrat or Republican”, and that’s causing a lot of this proportional shift. I would bet that characterizes a lot of folks on this site who are not conservative.

    https://www.vox.com/politics/2024/3/13/24098780/politics-gender-divide-generation-z-youth-men-women

    https://www.allendowney.com/blog/2024/01/28/is-the-ideology-gap-growing/

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      On the flip side, in Europe extreme right parties are mostly being propped up by young men, while in other age groups men and women vote relatively similarly, which supports this finding.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Exactly. I would be almost as upset with being classified as a liberal or a Democrat as I would be a conservative.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        At the same time I know many people (my brother included) that claim to be “independent” because they think that the trump camp is somehow outside the conservative camp, and therefore respond “independent” on polls. Because they think “I’m not democrat or conservative, I just want to drain the swamp” and then support trump, who is literally a swamp.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This is your brain on idealism, just pure vibes. Political astrology.

        • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Have you read it? Don’t judge too quickly!

          Actually on second thought nvm. If that’s you’re response then I’m out :)

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            No, but like… dude, you could flip half of those supposed traits between categories and it would read exactly the same. That’s why I called it astrology.

            Perhaps you just did a bad job of presenting the book’s ideas, but I’ve just read through a summary of it and it didn’t exactly make me reconsider my knee jerk reaction.

            • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Thanks for explaining. I did a bad job explaining it, but I’m only taking a short break irl and am just jumping into this conversation. I’ve removed that section of my comment.

              The book explains this in more detail and I recommend it. We don’t get much deep discussion into what it means to be conservative/liberal and the purpose of the book isn’t to go into that but it does provide a framework. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Jacobs

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      56 minutes ago

      Anti-feminism has taken a huge hold in SK. it’s partially related to the draft, but that’s nothing new. women have been getting increased respect over the past decades, esp in sharp contrast to the pre-war era when women didnt even deserve names beyond “X’s mom”.

      the situation for women is actually improving a lot here, in many ways better than in other developed nations. consider it just one last baby whine

    • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      SK is wild right now. Women are taking part in the 4B movement (no dating, sex, childbirth, or marriage. The Korean words start with “B”). There was a online feminist group that got people so heated they thought they were sneaking hand signals into “male” media and they were getting people fired. If certain characters didn’t come out with risqué enough clothing, male netizens would blame some secret feminist in the company. Women are assaulted if they’re confused for a feminist due to just their hairstyle. A book (“Kim Jiyoung 1989” I think) that is, like, baby’s first feminist literature, can have your spouse leave you. Men say you can’t date a woman whose read it. All the book is about is the subtle sexism women face. They have an epidemic of “molka,” which are secret cameras in women’s bathrooms among other places. Women tell each other to bring nail polish to paint over the screws to protect themselves. Their new president is looking to abolish the gender equality ministry and blames feminism for the low birth rate.

      TL;DR: Yeah, it’s pretty bad over there right now.

    • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      oh yeah, South Korea has gone off the rails recently. lots of news stories about men assaulting women for the assumption that they’re feminists, anti-woman politicians being elected, women losing their jobs for being (or assumed to be) feminists, it’s all Very Not Good.

    • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      A better voting system than First Past The Post is proven to create less of a divide between parties and supports either new parties forming, making existing parties more likely to work together on bi-partisan goals, as well as bringing existing parties more towards the center.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What’s the source? I wanna learn about the weird unexpected drops in some countries.

    • s3p5r@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      For anyone else also interested, I went and had a look at the links Dessalines kindly provided.

      The source on the graphs says “Sources: Daniel Cox, Survey Center on American Life; Gallup Poll Social Series; FT analysis of General Social Surveys of Korea, Germany & US and the British Election Study. US data is respondent’s stated ideology. Other countries show support for liberal and conservative parties All figures are adjusted for time trend in the overall population.” Where FT is financial times.

      It’s not clear how the words “liberal” and “conservative” were chosen, whether they’re intended to mean “socially progressive” and “socially traditional” or have other connotations bound with the political parties too, and whether the original data chose those descriptions or if they’re FT’s inference as being “close enough” for an American audience.

      Unfortunately the FT data site is refusing to let me look at them without “legitimate interest” advertising cookies so I can’t tell you much more or if there’s any detail on methodology.

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    shit sucks which primes people for radicalization and The Algorithm basically pushes men to be chud shitheads (which doesn’t really work for women because who is going to listen to “become a baby machine” and think YEAH, BET)

    • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’d be surprised, until they encounter what that actually means and will mean for them specifically - some conservative women trick themselves into thinking they’ll be given an exemption. Or they really just don’t what it means until someone like Crowder is brow-beating them and not letting them leave

    • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Lol yeah woman were much safer, better educated, and financially independent historically. /S

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Read “why women had better sex under socialism, and other arguments for economic independence”

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Current trends will definitely continue and there has never been large sociopolitical upheavals in the past, and there definitely won’t be any in the future.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Current trends will definitely continue and there has never been large sociopolitical upheavals in the past, and there definitely won’t be any in the future.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Here, have some unsourced data on subjective tendencies.

    Nah, that doesn’t count as data just yet then.

    Especially not at a point in time where someone like Trump is said to represent “Conservatism”.